AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

GPS under transmission lines

28 Posts
22 Users
0 Reactions
4,077 Views
Frank Shelton
(@frank-shelton)
Posts: 273
Free
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

i've seen from time to time that problems regarding positions can happen under high voltage transmission lines. just wondering what anyone has run into.

we are currently running some cross sections and the last area to be sectioned has a bunch of transmission lines on two rows of towers almost directly above the section. it would be easier to GPS, but i don't want any BS ground info from the effects of the overheads.

any info would be helpful...even if, and maybe especially, if it is personal experience.

thanks a group.


 
Posted : September 14, 2017 7:57 pm
Williwaw
(@williwaw)
Posts: 3649
Member P&R, Founder
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

In general I've not had any problems, even around the high voltage transmission lines, 6 abreast, but they tend to be strung high off the ground. I did recently have issues of not being able to get initialized with my base underneath some 2 phase lines with maybe 16' of separation, but it didn't cause positional inaccuracies, just radio interference. I'd used the point a dozen times before with no issues. Only this time humidity was high following a lot of rain. Curious of others experience.


Just because I'm paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get me.

 
Posted : September 14, 2017 8:36 pm
scottb
(@scottb)
Posts: 51
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I haven't had problems with GPS under powerlines using a static observation to submit to OPUS, haven't tried RTK however. Just to show how old I am, I remember High Voltage transmission lines sure raised Hell when using Tellurometers. Does anybody even remember these?
ScottB


 
Posted : September 14, 2017 8:53 pm
anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I've worked under them and can't say I've had problems,
I was bought up to believe in them as a not good area, but can't conclude from my work that to be the case.

Haven't used a Tellurometer under one but remember setting up the TS on a reference bar inside the tower legs on a very damp day.
The tower and lines were crackling and fizzing and I was quite happy to leave the site.


 
Posted : September 14, 2017 9:07 pm
paden-cash
(@paden-cash)
Posts: 11086
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Worked around and under xmission lines a bunch with both static and rtk, literally hundreds (if not a few thousand) miles, mostly 135 and 270 kV. In general I've never had any problems with gps reception. From time to time I believe there can be some harmonic rf interference that affects the link between the dc and the receivers. Static can cause a little havoc with the screens on the dc. It was never anything that couldn't be overcome by jockeying around for position.

I would rather work around xmission lines than airports.


 
Posted : September 14, 2017 9:39 pm

Peter Kozub
(@peter-kozub)
Posts: 242
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Zero Problems next to 500KV substation and towers for 6 months

Multi path for GPS electronics from the books i have read is most difficult for the hardware/soft to
resolve when the object causing the multi path is 100 ft +- from the rover = a large transmission tower

I have seen this next to LARGE industrial cranes in large pile driving jobs set the pile points
and go from one to another start to finish to weed out multi path points= seldom a bad point
well due diligence 1:1000

its a easy walk thru the site to detect multi path by hitting the layout once more time

can set 90 pile points in four hour and check them in one hour


 
Posted : September 14, 2017 10:03 pm
mark-o
(@mark-o)
Posts: 176
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Contrary to others, I've found it takes about twice as long to initialize, and re-initialize under high power transmission lines.
i just figured it was based on poor satellite geometry, but maybe newer more resilient receivers work better?


 
Posted : September 14, 2017 10:47 pm
Fredh
(@fredh)
Posts: 89
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The only issue I recall was 10 years ago, we had crew chief set up the rtk base under some lines on a dry winter day, the external pac-crest radio had a 12' pole with a whip antenna. After 8 hours of he went to break down the set-up and got quite a wallop of static shock when grabbing the antenna pole.


 
Posted : September 15, 2017 6:20 am
paden-cash
(@paden-cash)
Posts: 11086
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Mark O, post: 446853, member: 11591 wrote: Contrary to others, I've found it takes about twice as long to initialize, and re-initialize under high power transmission lines.
i just figured it was based on poor satellite geometry, but maybe newer more resilient receivers work better?

I did have more trouble with our older Hiper units than the present GR series we use (3s and 5s). Not much, but the Hipers were a little more picky.


 
Posted : September 15, 2017 6:22 am
john-putnam
(@john-putnam)
Posts: 2467
Member Founder, Sustainer
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I have not had any problems with RTK under BPA transmission lines with the exception of radio coms. Not quite in the day of the Tellurometer, but I did have a Wild 2002 give up the ghost while working under a line on a typical November day in Oregon. There was enough static e in the area that even the heavy rollers were vibrating from it. On the plus side, Wild repaired the TS for free because they said it should have stood up to the conditions. Those were the days.


 
Posted : September 15, 2017 8:05 am

nate-the-surveyor
(@nate-the-surveyor)
Posts: 10538
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Javad works fine under a transmission line, as long as it's a 4 wheel drive, and has a lift kit. However, it's better to move the truck if possible. 😉 just remember to take it off the pole!
N


 
Posted : September 15, 2017 8:10 am
lee-d
(@lee-d)
Posts: 2382
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'm surprised to see so many saying they've never had problems around transmission lines, I've seen all kinds of problems from them. Generally high noise on the satellite signals which translates to less precise positions and difficulty initializing RTK, and OPUS solutions with far lower percentages of observations used and ambiguities fixed than I would normally expect, resulting in higher peak to peak error estimates. With older equipment I can remember seeing a base that was set up under them and the rover couldn't initialize.

Nothing personal, but setting a high radio antenna under transmission lines for eight hours then walking up and touching it without grounding it first isn't a terribly wise thing to do.


 
Posted : September 15, 2017 8:21 am
Crashbox
(@crashbox)
Posts: 547
Member
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

From what I can recall, we've had no issues working under high-tension lines although initialization did seem to take longer but not by much. We are a Leica shop FWIW.

As for Tellurometers: that's long before my time but I have read about them in ancient history. From what I remember, it was important to know the wet-bulb temperature at both ends and the operator had to watch out for transpiration from grass fields under the line being shot, I think the condition was called "ground swing" or something like that...


The only superior evidence is that which you haven't yet found.

 
Posted : September 15, 2017 8:24 am
Peter Kozub
(@peter-kozub)
Posts: 242
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I worked right next to the largest 500 KV switch yard in BC for 4 months with the base about 200 meters away from HV lines / massive transformers
the rover was under 500 KV power lines all day long up and next to bush line as well
Not a single issue with RTK at all
Leica gs 14 and satel UHF
fiberglass rods.

No problems at all Zero just as if we where in the middle of a empty desert
same experiences with sokkia GSR1700CSX which have a novatel gps board inside just like the Leica GS14
no problems at all.


 
Posted : September 15, 2017 8:48 am
Jim in AZ
(@jim-in-az)
Posts: 3374
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I've not had too much trouble around overhead lines other than induced current in the scope of a K&E Paragon transit when it was parallel with the lines. This caused a spark to jump to my hand or eyebrow every time I touched the scope or looked through it.

We had an incident several years ago working inside a substation site where a Total Station was fried. We billed the client for the cost of the motherboard replacement and they never questioned it - but we won't work in a substation again. The vibration of the prism rod when it was within a few feet of the perimeter fence was a bit unnerving.


 
Posted : September 15, 2017 8:57 am

MarkSilver
(@mark-silver)
Posts: 713
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I was on a 8 section topo about 5 years ago (correction April 2011). We ran everything we could on the customer's brand new Razors. This was 'my' outfit (with an Altus rover):

There were some MAJOR giant power lines and erector set poles going through the middle of the job.

I had three brands of receivers deployed and they would all loose fix if you drove faster than 10 MPH under the lines, but if you stopped, they would refix after about 20 seconds. They would not fix if you were moving, but there was a sweet spot under 10 MPH where you could retain a fix.

I looked for abnormalities in the data, but did not see any.

So this job probably deserves a little backstory:

Customer calls and says they need an 8 section topo completed (in Western Colorado) by Monday at 10:00 am. (This was for a big wetland bank project.) It is Thursday at 3:00 pm. Can it be done? Well, if you cowboy up, absolutely! We had 6 ATV's gathered on the site on Friday, with a PF500 base and 8 rovers with 7 operators. The four-wheelers ran the edges of every ditches stopping to take five shots cross the ditch every 100 yards, holding a pole off the side of the ATV. We ran two razors back and forth through the plowed fields (see video below).

This is a video of me: https://photos.app.goo.gl/mOO4NUfedc01coKg2 (that is a PM500 and I was collecting a shot every 10 feet.)

I did that for 16 hours straight on Saturday.

We processed data in the evenings, pushing it back to the customer's office where a team of 4 engineers where doing the design work on a 24-hour a day schedule. I believe that they submitted the plans on Tuesday at 8:00 am.

It took 16 months to get paid if I remember correctly....

🙂


 
Posted : September 15, 2017 11:45 am
makerofmaps
(@makerofmaps)
Posts: 560
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Unfortunately we battle this all the time. Most of the time we get good results. We try however to set control that is not directly under the lines. We use R8 and R10ƒ??s. Radio range is always effected. We never try and set inside a 500kv substation. We will set our control outside and run it in. Most of the time we scan the substations now and try to use rods as little as possible. Last time I was in a 500 yard the truck would shock the crap out of you from static electricity. So you know to slap the truck to get the shock over with. Or you do as I do and let other people on the crew touch it first. Canƒ??t believe they never caught on. I was chuckling all day.


 
Posted : September 15, 2017 12:37 pm
loyal
(@loyal)
Posts: 3735
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Mark Silver, post: 446947, member: 1087 wrote: I was on a 8 section topo about 5 years ago (correction April 2011). We ran everything we could on the customer's brand new Razors. This was 'my' outfit (with an Altus rover):

There were some MAJOR giant power lines and erector set poles going through the middle of the job.

I had three brands of receivers deployed and they would all loose fix if you drove faster than 10 MPH under the lines, but if you stopped, they would refix after about 20 seconds. They would not fix if you were moving, but there was a sweet spot under 10 MPH where you could retain a fix.

I looked for abnormalities in the data, but did not see any.

So this job probably deserves a little backstory:

Customer calls and says they need an 8 section topo completed (in Western Colorado) by Monday at 10:00 am. (This was for a big wetland bank project.) It is Thursday at 3:00 pm. Can it be done? Well, if you cowboy up, absolutely! We had 6 ATV's gathered on the site on Friday, with a PF500 base and 8 rovers with 7 operators. The four-wheelers ran the edges of every ditches stopping to take five shots cross the ditch every 100 yards, holding a pole off the side of the ATV. We ran two razors back and forth through the plowed fields (see video below).

This is a video of me: https://photos.app.goo.gl/mOO4NUfedc01coKg2 (that is a PM500 and I was collecting a shot every 10 feet.)

I did that for 16 hours straight on Saturday.

We processed data in the evenings, pushing it back to the customer's office where a team of 4 engineers where doing the design work on a 24-hour a day schedule. I believe that they submitted the plans on Tuesday at 8:00 am.

It took 16 months to get paid if I remember correctly....

🙂

Soooo, is that what some folks call a "Drive By Survey?"

😎


 
Posted : September 15, 2017 12:51 pm
lsitnj
(@lsitnj)
Posts: 268
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Guy I went to college with did senior project on this subject (nothing too complicated-just a comparison of observations between GPS TPS) . Nothing unusual in the conclusions...


 
Posted : September 15, 2017 1:09 pm
clearcut
(@clearcut)
Posts: 937
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Mark Silver, post: 446947, member: 1087 wrote: ......

... We ran everything we could on the customer's brand new Razors. This was 'my' outfit (with an Altus rover):

There were some MAJOR giant power lines and erector set poles going through the middle of the job.

I had three brands of receivers deployed and they would all loose fix if you drove faster than 10 MPH under the lines, but if you stopped, they would refix after about 20 seconds. They would not fix if you were moving, but there was a sweet spot under 10 MPH where you could retain a fix.

......

🙂

Guess that leaves me out of that game. Kinda sorta along the lines of Sammy Hagar's song, "I can't drive 55". Being buckled into a Razor and keeping it under 10 mph is, is, well it is just wrong.


 
Posted : September 15, 2017 1:48 pm

Page 1 / 2