Notifications
Clear all

GPS ROVER POLES

16 Posts
13 Users
0 Reactions
1 Views
(@sir-veysalot)
Posts: 658
Registered
Topic starter
 

Just wondering what was being used, likes/dislikes/ $. We are in need of a couple and saw some aluminum for about $100, carbon fiber tele for about 270. We have used the standard 2m carbon fiber 2piece but what do y'all use, why, and how much.

 
Posted : April 17, 2014 2:06 pm
(@kevin-hines)
Posts: 874
Registered
 

I prefer the collapsible 2m carbon fiber rods because of their light weight and ease of storage.

 
Posted : April 17, 2014 2:11 pm
(@jimmy-cleveland)
Posts: 2812
 

I use the Seco 2 meter Snap-Loc rods. They work great for me. I have a two piece carbon fiber 2 meter rod, that gets used only when I am running 4 static units.

 
Posted : April 17, 2014 2:35 pm
(@bruce-small)
Posts: 1508
Registered
 

I haeGPS ROVER POLES

I have the standard metal two-piece fixed pole that came with the rover, but I bought an extendable carbon fiber pole that is my first choice for almost all work. Carbon fiber because it is light, and the extendable feature paid for itself the first week. Very, very useful. (It also means buying longer cables to match.)

 
Posted : April 17, 2014 3:10 pm
(@broken-lath)
Posts: 85
Registered
 

Depends... right?

The 11.5' carbon rod is only .5 lbs lighter than the aluminum version.

If you are mapping parking lots or surveying cornfields, the fixed rods may work fine.

If you are running lines in canopy or tall brush, you will want to have
a number of sections to get the rover head up.

The other thing you may want to consider is how fragile the carbon rods
are, especially when used with unmodified Seco bipods.

While carbon rods are cool, they definitely have a shorter lifespan.

If you have ham hand klutz crews sharing equipment, the carbon rods
will be torn up pretty quick.

 
Posted : April 17, 2014 3:18 pm
(@bruce-small)
Posts: 1508
Registered
 

Yeah, but, half a pound times several miles in a day times 250 days in a year times several years adds up. Go for the lightest and best, I say.

 
Posted : April 17, 2014 3:38 pm
(@sir-veysalot)
Posts: 658
Registered
Topic starter
 

Aluminum or carbon fiber

 
Posted : April 17, 2014 5:02 pm
(@jimcox)
Posts: 1951
 

> Go for the lightest and best, I say.

Applies to both field crews and poles 🙂

 
Posted : April 18, 2014 1:27 am
(@george-matica)
Posts: 316
Registered
 

> Just wondering what was being used, likes/dislikes/ $. We are in need of a couple and saw some aluminum for about $100, carbon fiber tele for about 270. We have used the standard 2m carbon fiber 2piece but what do y'all use, why, and how much.

2m fixed carbon fiber Trimble Seco.

FWIW, adjustable ht. carbon fiber Trimble Seco for the robots.

 
Posted : April 18, 2014 5:54 am
(@thiggins)
Posts: 110
Registered
 

I like aluminum for the durability. Carbon Fiber is lighter, but most of your weight is in the DC/Receiver/Antenna, so you won't really notice much difference between the two.

Fixed height is also nice, though the collapsible is good if you're having to get in and out of a truck a lot since you can fit it into the cab with you without hassle.

 
Posted : April 18, 2014 6:15 am
(@harold)
Posts: 494
Registered
 

I use a twist lock seco 8-foot aluminum pole with aluminum seco bipod with a plastic pole clip and attached ranger 3. Kinda heavy for a setup, but carrying a collapsed pole through the underbrush is a little easier than a two meter pole. The bipod gives me a steady read on a point. My atv does most of the carrying for me! The twist lock is a little bit of a nuiscance in that I have to keep the threads lightly lubricated and tight. A quick lock lever is constantly getting caught and hung on vines and branches. I like setting up on a point and raising the rod straight up through branches and hope I get a good signal.

Spring has sprung around northeast Mississippi, and we almost have full-grown leaves on all the trees, so my GPS reception is way down.

 
Posted : April 18, 2014 6:53 am
(@toivo1037)
Posts: 788
Registered
 

I've had a couple differnt ones so here is my take:
2m 2-piece alum rods for static. Weight usually isn't an issue.
The collapsible alum snap lock rods for rtk and robot work.

The reason is I find the extra alum pole weight to not be an issue (and weight is a huge deal for me) but more importantly I find the pole more balanced. The carbon fiber pole wit the rover on top is way too top heavy, and the alum pole gives more control when staking out.

Also, the carbon fiber ones just don't last - and I don't think that I am that hard on equipment.

 
Posted : April 18, 2014 7:17 am
(@drilldo)
Posts: 321
Registered
 

We have two of these http://www.stakemill.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=3611 and we like them. They don't look as "cool" as carbon fiber but they work fine and the weight has not been an issue.

 
Posted : April 18, 2014 7:42 am
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 9920
Registered
 

Can't stand the carbon fiber 2 meter ones except for static locations, keep some around for that. Use only the extendable aluminum rods, I want to make them small for the 4-wheeler and to get in and out of the truck, and to change H.I.'s to change multi-path and check locations.

But any rod I use needs two bubbles in sync with each other.

 
Posted : April 18, 2014 8:41 am
(@joe-f)
Posts: 471
Registered
 

Seco collapsible 2m carbon fiber rods.

 
Posted : April 18, 2014 8:42 am
(@toivo1037)
Posts: 788
Registered
 

Yep, that is the one that I use. Love the gradations on the side for construction stakeout.

 
Posted : April 18, 2014 10:07 am