AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Surveyor faulted for staking wrong lot

36 Posts
29 Users
0 Reactions
1,364 Views
djames
(@djames)
Posts: 850
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

There is no way a Professional surveyor would stake a house like that with out tying back to something to verify the correct lot . When it comes out I bet its the party chiefs fault . We have trained a bunch of button pushers . In the end the Professional will get punished big time.


 
Posted : October 15, 2014 1:55 pm
john-hamilton
(@john-hamilton)
Posts: 3438
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

here is another good one...Stellular Triangulation, exact to the thousandth...

I learned the first time I purchased a home that there is only one way to exactly locate the location of a piece of land. I purchased my home with a VA Diredct loan. I did all of the paperwork my self as the realtor didn't know how. This has been fourty years ago. This method of survaying is called Stellular Triangulation and is exact to the thousanth. When most developers develop property they file a Primary Plat which is not always exact. Many times lot dimensions change due to construction problems such as Perk test. In my 25 years as a Real Estate Associate and Principal Auctioner I have seen the developer leave land that noone really ownes as it is no longer accessable. This can be easilly remedied by accession and requires a simple court procedure in most stated as noone has actually been paying taxes on the property. In this case I would look for liability restitution from the surveyers unless the type of survey was indicated by a specific contract. JUST MY OPENION as I am now retired.

A lot of the posters seem to think that the obvious solution is GPS.


 
Posted : October 15, 2014 3:11 pm
carl-b-correll
(@carl-b-correll)
Posts: 1899
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The posters on the Yahoo message boards seem to be more "yahoo-ish" than almost any other comment area on the interwebz. I read the comments sections for personal humor, but most of the time I end up getting enraged by the utter stupidity of 99.9% of the posters.


 
Posted : October 15, 2014 5:03 pm
James Johnston
(@james-johnston)
Posts: 624
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'm proud of us

> This surveyor will probably lose his company over this, and all his employees and their families will probably be out of work and go without food on their tables.

Hopefully not, professional liability insurance should help out get out of this mess. And as other pointed, maybe the full story paints a different picture. Let's hope so.


 
Posted : October 15, 2014 8:09 pm
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 11990
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Oh my gosh...you mean I have been doing it wrong all these years?


 
Posted : October 15, 2014 8:14 pm

Bruce Small
(@bruce-small)
Posts: 1573
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Exactly. Shoot the centerline pavement, anything, just to be sure you are about in the right place.


 
Posted : October 15, 2014 8:16 pm
DeletedUser
(@deleted-user)
Posts: 8340
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'm proud of us

> > This surveyor will probably lose his company over this, and all his employees and their families will probably be out of work and go without food on their tables.
>
> Hopefully not, professional liability insurance should help out get out of this mess. And as other pointed, maybe the full story paints a different picture. Let's hope so.

Hopefully not for sure. But, in all probability the builder selected the lowest bidder for the survey and the lowest bidder to stake the foundation. I would venture to speculate that the lowest bidder does not have E&O


 
Posted : October 15, 2014 8:28 pm
andy-j
(@andy-j)
Posts: 3114
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

hey, that's a great band name "Stellular Triangulation"


 
Posted : October 16, 2014 7:11 am
cee-gee
(@cee-gee)
Posts: 482
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'm proud of us

> I have staked the wrong lot before. It was a comedy of errors

Thank you paden for coming clean on this. I've done it too. Mine was a stupid mistake in a subdivision where all the lots were 100' square but somebody doing our research copied the street names wrong. Owner pulled in and asked what the hell we were doing -- "What survey? I didn't order any frigging survey." I'm glad it happened. I was a young i-man at the time and it taught me to always ask whether I'm where I think I am. Since then I've pulled into the wrong driveway a few times but never got out and did much.


 
Posted : October 16, 2014 7:29 am
Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 8310
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> Exactly. Shoot the centerline pavement, anything, just to be sure you are about in the right place.
In this case just pacing it off would have done the trick.


 
Posted : October 16, 2014 9:17 am

RADIORED
(@radiored)
Posts: 46
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I would hate to be these guys . did they follow FL. Minimum standards. I do not think so. The state board will be looking into I am sure.


 
Posted : October 16, 2014 10:01 am
jph
 jph
(@jph)
Posts: 2331
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> There is no way a Professional surveyor would stake a house like that with out tying back to something to verify the correct lot . When it comes out I bet its the party chiefs fault . We have trained a bunch of button pushers . In the end the Professional will get punished big time.

Yes, it's scary to see this and know that it could happen. I could imagine getting a call from the field, the crew saying that our traverse points are gone, and me telling them to setup on the lot corners (that we recently either set or located).

Then instead of occupying and BS'ing the locus lot corners, they mistakenly set on the adjoining lot. And then when I'm running the field data in CAD, the BS distance checks, and everything looks right - but it's really on the wrong lot.

I'd like to think that I would've had them check something else, but don't know, maybe thinking that they'd just been there, and it not even crossing my mind that they wouldn't remember which lot they were on.

This is a wake-up call for those of us who aren't in the field for everything.


 
Posted : October 16, 2014 10:11 am
Wendell
(@wendell)
Posts: 5946
Admin
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

While I agree with checking enough to make sure you are where you think you need to be, the first step would be having the correct parcel information. If you are on lot 13 and supposed to be on lot 31 because you transposed the numbers, no amount of measurement checking is going to save you.

Without researching the whole issue, I don't know what actually caused the error though.


Like what we do here? Donate
Need a new or refreshed website? Five Point Web Solutions
Looking for a web host? Website Hosting & Management

 
Posted : October 16, 2014 11:18 am
Bruce Small
(@bruce-small)
Posts: 1573
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I remember the rush survey for the child care center at the intersection of A and B. Not until we got the title report did I realize there were two child care centers at the intersection of A and B: The obvious one is plain sight on the south side, and the less obvious one in the building on the north side.


 
Posted : October 16, 2014 4:30 pm
brad-ott
(@brad-ott)
Posts: 6178
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> My favorite so far:
>
>
> Angel Momma 2 hours ago
>
> The GPS is most likely correct. When the original pins were placed in the days of old, the instruments used back then had to be properly adjusted for altitude and season to get accurate readings. When the Earth tilts on its axis it effects the results of the readings on old surveying equipment and "north" isn't always true north.

Mine too.


 
Posted : October 16, 2014 4:58 pm

brad-ott
(@brad-ott)
Posts: 6178
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> here is another good one...Stellular Triangulation, exact to the thousandth...
>
> I learned the first time I purchased a home that there is only one way to exactly locate the location of a piece of land. I purchased my home with a VA Diredct loan. I did all of the paperwork my self as the realtor didn't know how. This has been fourty years ago. This method of survaying is called Stellular Triangulation and is exact to the thousanth. When most developers develop property they file a Primary Plat which is not always exact. Many times lot dimensions change due to construction problems such as Perk test. In my 25 years as a Real Estate Associate and Principal Auctioner I have seen the developer leave land that noone really ownes as it is no longer accessable. This can be easilly remedied by accession and requires a simple court procedure in most stated as noone has actually been paying taxes on the property. In this case I would look for liability restitution from the surveyers unless the type of survey was indicated by a specific contract. JUST MY OPENION as I am now retired.
>

>
> A lot of the posters seem to think that the obvious solution is GPS.

Also very nice.


 
Posted : October 16, 2014 5:00 pm
Page 2 / 2