Notifications
Clear all

Client Wants to Create A Pin Farm

49 Posts
26 Users
0 Reactions
8 Views
(@drjeckyl)
Posts: 73
Registered
Topic starter
 

Just got comments back from a client on an ALTA. One of the comments is "Please set an iron pin at the corner".
We found and show on the face of the survey map a 1/2" iron rod / no cap, being on line and 1.03 feet west. Talked with the client and they don't care that there is an offset and that it will create a "pin farm".
This will be the first pin farm that I get to create. Yiiippppeeee![sarcasm][/sarcasm]

 
Posted : November 1, 2012 12:29 pm
(@rob-bachara)
Posts: 104
 

Talk them into a flagged hub at the "true" corner instead; did that recently. At least then they can see what's going on without causing problems down the road. You know better, they don't. Educate them.

 
Posted : November 1, 2012 12:48 pm
(@nate-the-surveyor)
Posts: 10522
Registered
 

IF I rejected one that far away, I'd be careful.

IF I rejected one that far away, I'd set a monument OF SUBSTANCE, at the "True Corner".

Maybe 1" rebar, with aluminum Cap.

Or something like that. Go to your local SCRAP METAL yard, where they BUY metal, and they like to sell you stuff, at about 2x what they paid for it. Around here I usually BUY at 0.20 a pound.

 
Posted : November 1, 2012 1:26 pm
(@tp-stephens)
Posts: 327
Registered
 

For goodness sake, document the rejected pin and set the corner with a substantial mon. Why wouldn't the client want that in every case when they understand the offset??

If you find something that looks like a mon but does not qualify, goat stakes etal, DO document and remove them. Leave things clean and clear of misunderstandings for the owners and contractors.

 
Posted : November 1, 2012 1:28 pm
(@c-billingsley)
Posts: 819
Registered
 

The first thing to come to my mind is that the found pin might be on an offset for a reason. Are you sure there is not something there preventing it from being set at the corner?

 
Posted : November 1, 2012 1:43 pm
(@adamsurveyor)
Posts: 1487
 

When I find a property pin, my presumption is that it is the corner, and I look for evidence to reject it. If I accept a monument, I annotate the bearing and distance I measured to that monument, and add the deed call in parentheses as being the "record" call. If I find reason to reject it, I set my own monument.

I don't blame the client for wanting his corners set. He wants you to take a stance and set something he can rely on as his property corner. I would want an iron with a cap and your license number on it as something I can point to and say "that's the corner" according to the professional I hired.

Are you sure the corner monument you measured from to get there wasn't the one off a foot? (Okay, being sarcastic a bit. I am sure you have confidence on where you're coming from)

 
Posted : November 1, 2012 1:49 pm
(@eapls2708)
Posts: 1862
Registered
 

You had already created a virtual pincushion when you showed the 1/2" iron as not being at the corner. The only difference between the virtual pincushion and a tangible one in the field is that the virtual one is only apparent upon inspection of the map (and presuming the holder of the map knows how to read it), and the tangible one is obvious to anyone who comes across it in the field.

A pincushion is not a negative on the subsequent surveyor simply because he set another monument in the immediate vicinity of a found apparent monument. The negative is on the subsequent surveyor if he rejected the existing marker without thoroughly investigating how it got there, why it's there, who placed it, and if he rejected it without adequate reason for doing so. If it's essentially a meaningless piece of scrap metal, the proverbial "goat stake", then you serve your client better by properly monumenting the corner.

I'm not making a judgment call on whether or not the 1/2" iron was something that should have been accepted. If not, I can understand why the owner wants the actual corner marked. He may be looking ahead to hiring a fence contractor and can envision one whole line fenced incorrectly because they went to the unmarked 1/2" iron rod.

 
Posted : November 1, 2012 2:34 pm
(@perry-williams)
Posts: 2187
Registered
 

If I had a survey done, I would want a monument set at the actual corner. I don't think it's asking a lot.

 
Posted : November 1, 2012 2:38 pm
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 7610
Registered
 

:good: I agree.

 
Posted : November 1, 2012 3:56 pm
 pls
(@pls)
Posts: 211
Registered
 

Not only do I agree with that-

The bogus pin does not need to be there.
If you think it's wrong, pull it.
Set a new marker with a new cap and show the client where his property corner is.
That is why he hired you.

 
Posted : November 1, 2012 6:48 pm
(@deleted-user)
Posts: 8349
Registered
 

If you find something that looks like a mon but does not qualify, goat stakes etal, DO document and remove them. Leave things clean and clear of misunderstandings for the owners and contractors.

And for the adjoiners! It is their corner monument too.

 
Posted : November 1, 2012 8:21 pm
(@stephen-calder)
Posts: 465
Registered
 

The client is right. You are wrong. I agree with everyone above, esp. with EAPLS2708.

Stephen

 
Posted : November 2, 2012 2:27 am
 Norm
(@norm)
Posts: 1290
Registered
 

Way too much agreeing going here this close to the election,

 
Posted : November 2, 2012 3:43 am
 jph
(@jph)
Posts: 2332
Registered
 

I'd be pretty pissed if someone yanked my rod and then set their own a foot away.

Plastic caps pop off all the time - frost, animals, kids, etc.

I think that a search for plans and questioning the neighbors are order, to find out the origin of the rod.

If it's by another surveyor, I'd give him a call. If it's from some unlicensed clown or field guy moonlighting, then I may not have a problem lifting it.

 
Posted : November 2, 2012 4:10 am
(@drjeckyl)
Posts: 73
Registered
Topic starter
 

There are laws in many states that prohibit the removal of "a monumented corner"

 
Posted : November 2, 2012 4:24 am
(@drjeckyl)
Posts: 73
Registered
Topic starter
 

Nothing there prohibiting the setting of a corner. The other three corners were all in and within a couple hundredths

 
Posted : November 2, 2012 4:26 am
(@rob-bachara)
Posts: 104
 

I thought I'd get a lot more replies after lobbing that one in there.

 
Posted : November 2, 2012 4:30 am
(@foggyidea)
Posts: 3467
Registered
 

Why did you reject the existing iron pin? Math???

 
Posted : November 2, 2012 4:34 am
(@davidalee)
Posts: 1121
Registered
 

By rejecting the existing monument and setting a new one, you are stating that it isn't a monument. Therefore, there would be no law against removing it.

 
Posted : November 2, 2012 4:44 am
 jph
(@jph)
Posts: 2332
Registered
 

:good:

Yes, that's what I'd like to know. And is it possible that the rod fits with the abutter's parcel, which may have senior rights?

 
Posted : November 2, 2012 5:01 am
Page 1 / 3