AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

RTK & Levelling for Topography Survey

9 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
1,130 Views
Franz Holmes
(@franz-holmes)
Posts: 24
Free
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I have been relying on my RTK elevations more & more & more for my topography surveys.
Used to be that I would run a level loop on main or majority of traverse stations to adjust their elevations. Lately however I do several RTK readings for traverse stations tat are under open skies. I place the base near project center to reduce systematic errors. Check RTK results with trigonometric elevations from TS, if values differ by 5-20 cm then I use the RTK values for z.

For projects that require accurate levels then I bring out the digital level but for topography surveys of raw lands that are mostly for design purposes, then I rely more now on RTK.

Anyone else taking this approach?


 
Posted : May 13, 2015 11:16 pm
stlsurveyor
(@stlsurveyor)
Posts: 2513
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

When we use MoDOT (Missouri's DOT) VRS network with Geoid12A we can hit St. Louis County benchmarks within 0.02'. Yes we use it a lot.


N10,000, E7,000, Z100.00
PLS - IL, MO, AR, KS, MN, KY

 
Posted : May 14, 2015 4:19 am
Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 8474
Member P&R, Founder
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> I have been relying on my RTK elevations more & more & more for my topography surveys.
> ...I do several RTK readings for traverse stations tat are under open skies. ...
Several readings one after the other, under the same satellite geometry, probably doesn't do much for you. 2 readings, separated in time by at least a half hour would be much better. Give the satellites a little time to travel.

>...if values differ by 5-20 cm then I use the RTK values for z.
5 cm (~0.15')seems like quite a lot to me. 20 cm is definitely too much for me, for the work I do.

Getting the base in a very open position is key.

I believe that repeatable elevations at the 1-2cm level are achievable with RTK alone.


 
Posted : May 14, 2015 5:45 am
foggyidea
(@foggyidea)
Posts: 3462
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I find it totally feasible. I check in with my control before starting, hit any traverse points during the topo then hit the control again when I'm done. For larger projects I hit multiple control points throughout the day and repeat as often as possible.

I, teasingly, say my middle name is "Redundent" LOL


 
Posted : May 14, 2015 7:33 am
Alan Chyko
(@alan-chyko)
Posts: 159
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I second this. Differences of 20cm seem huge, for either RTK-vs-redundant RTK or RTK-vs-conventional, certainly way out of tolerance for most of the stuff we work on.


 
Posted : May 14, 2015 7:51 am

Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 8474
Member P&R, Founder
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> I second this. Differences of 20cm seem huge...
He may have meant "mm", not "cm". 5-20mm would be reasonable for RTK.


 
Posted : May 14, 2015 7:55 am
Franz Holmes
(@franz-holmes)
Posts: 24
Free
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

5-20 cm for total station elevation closure.
Most of the time, 1-2 cm is achievable with a total station for a ~5 traverse station loop on flat open terrain. But when they pass through thick vegetation & sloping land then my error of closures reach 5-20 cm. These are the loops that I recheck via RTK.
If loop passes through tree canopies then I make it a point to set a point on open ground for the RTK check.

My experience is you can't efficiently do a level loop through thick vegetation. You will also get a high error of closure.


 
Posted : May 15, 2015 4:43 am
Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 8474
Member P&R, Founder
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> ... But when they pass through thick vegetation & sloping land then my error of closures reach 5-20 cm. ...
Thick vegetation and slopes really shouldn't affect your vertical closure. Failing to get your tripod's feet firmly planted in the jungle floor might. We have that problem here in the Pacific NW. Sometimes we have to dig through a foot or more of humus to get the tripod feet on solid ground.


 
Posted : May 15, 2015 8:35 am
wfwenzel
(@wfwenzel)
Posts: 438
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I've used RTK to get a base elevation, the more readings the better.

I've actually run several experiments over the years, and have come to these procedures:

When setting curb and gutter, sanitary sewer, and other critical stakes, I use a total station.

If my work area entails several stations, I always level between them. I use an "old" Wild NA-28, and I always close within .01'. That gives you, and more importantly, your subcontractors, the peace of mind they need. It's all about trust.

Sleep well. 😉


 
Posted : May 15, 2015 10:40 am