Notifications
Clear all

New Plotter

25 Posts
15 Users
0 Reactions
42 Views
(@cptdent)
Posts: 2089
Member
Topic starter
 

We finally had to bite the bullet and get a new plotter. The old one was a real work horse, but it finally went wheels up.
I searched the HP website and showed the Boss what I thought we needed. He decided that we just had to have a built-in scanner. OK. So we now have a HP T2500.
Tiny little thing compared to previous editions of HP plotters. Dual 36" roll feed, scanner and copier. Did I mention that it plots at the speed of light?! Compared to our old 1055, this thing is blazing fast. I actually get the plots in about 1/10 the time of the old plotter. The way the new HP plotters now handle prints, there's no need to print on a lrger sheet and use a roller trimmer to cut it down to size.
Awesome plotter. You'll need to hock your first born son to finance this beast, but the time savings and additional capabilities will save you enough money to hock him out before too long. (You may want to wait until after that "teen age" period before you go redeem him. Saves a lot of wear and tear on the ole body you know.)

 
Posted : December 20, 2013 1:57 pm
(@floyd-carrington)
Posts: 277
Member
 

How about waiting to after college to redeem him.

 
Posted : December 20, 2013 2:14 pm
(@cptdent)
Posts: 2089
Member
Topic starter
 

or until they can support YOU!! 😀

 
Posted : December 20, 2013 5:20 pm
(@james-fleming)
Posts: 5693
Member
 

We recently went from a 1055 to this.
Like making the transition from ox cart to Porsche.

 
Posted : December 20, 2013 5:27 pm
Bruce Small
(@bruce-small)
Posts: 1509
Member
 

Ooh, that is a nice plotter. Wow. I'm impressed. Good job, HP.

 
Posted : December 20, 2013 7:29 pm

eddycreek
(@eddycreek)
Posts: 1033
Supporter
 

We got one of those Canons. Kinda like flying an airplane.

 
Posted : December 20, 2013 7:47 pm
(@imaudigger)
Posts: 2958
Member
 

What actually went wrong with the 1055 plotter?
I'm curious because ours is 13 years old and aside from ink/print heads/belt/ clean and lubricate, we have had no issues.

Believe it or not, that new plotter/scanner/copier cost several thousand dollars less than the 1055CM plotter did back in 2000.
Sure are getting more for the money when it comes to technology these days. Time will tell if the new plotter will be a workhorse, or if HP included a self destruct program for free.

 
Posted : December 20, 2013 9:52 pm
stacy-carroll
(@stacy-carroll)
Posts: 922
Member
 

Be sure to subscribe to a good maintenance plan. The new machines need a lot more maintenance that the typical user can't take care of. Parts are really expensive as well. The compression roller on my seven year old Ricoh was $910. I paid about $13,000 for it and expected it to last longer than that before having to replace major components. The maintenance contract started at about $100/month but has gone up quite a bit. It doesn't cover parts after 90? days Food for thought.

 
Posted : December 21, 2013 5:49 am
(@james-fleming)
Posts: 5693
Member
 

> We got one of those Canons. Kinda like flying an airplane.

reminds me of the keyboards at an Emerson Lake & Palmer concert

 
Posted : December 21, 2013 7:01 am
(@larry-best)
Posts: 735
Member
 

At the very low end of plotters I just replaced my HP 430 with a HP T110.
I'm impressed.

 
Posted : December 21, 2013 8:29 am

(@cptdent)
Posts: 2089
Member
Topic starter
 

It lost all color alignment. It would print ALL of the drawing in each color separately and offset about 3 inches from each other. The entire drawing in black, then an offset red, then an offset yellow, etc.
We replaced the mother board 3 times and then it started not recognizing the print heads.
It simply lost its mind, so we had to send it to "The Home". +o(

 
Posted : December 21, 2013 8:47 am
(@e2014691rtrtrcom-2)
Posts: 24
Member
 

We just got the hp t 520. Great plotter at around $3k, really fast. The only complaint is that it doesn't like single sheets, so you have to mess with it to accept them. I intend to use the rest up then switch to rolls anyway...

 
Posted : December 21, 2013 9:27 am
stacy-carroll
(@stacy-carroll)
Posts: 922
Member
 

The "Monster" isn't merely a plotter. It plots, prints and copies as fast as lightening, and scans plans up to 36" wide. When the economy was good it was a very valuable piece of equipment. We did a lot of subdivision work and it was so easy to print ten copies of a twelve page subdivisiion plat. With the new requirement in GA to submit a scan on CD along with two hardcopies, I'm glad I have it.

 
Posted : December 22, 2013 6:53 am
(@j-t-strickland)
Posts: 494
Member
 

For us little guys, you can't beat it for the money.
I've had a designjet 100, which they don't make any more, for several years, and only bought print heads and ink. Seems like it cost around 1k, sheet feed only.

 
Posted : December 22, 2013 11:30 am
stacy-carroll
(@stacy-carroll)
Posts: 922
Member
 

I am a "little guy". During the real estate boom we did almost nothing but subdivisions. We had nowhere within 30 miles to do our printing. Running 100+ prints by blue line machine or on a regular plotter simply bogged things down. Now its just me and a part timer and I rarely use the Ricoh. But its paid for.

 
Posted : December 22, 2013 11:44 am

(@sir-veysalot)
Posts: 658
Member
 

Looks like really small cartridges

 
Posted : December 22, 2013 7:12 pm
(@1man-surveyor)
Posts: 127
Member
 

I too am a little guy, and I've had the HP110 for over 4 years now, its more than good enough for these slow times. Some months I just run prints on it to keep the heads clean. cost under $1000 at that time. Really good investment, and I am happy with it. But, whenever things pick up the first thing i will invest in is a faster plotter. Sitting waiting for plots isnt my favourite pastime.

 
Posted : December 22, 2013 8:41 pm
Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 7680
Member
 

> We finally had to bite the bullet and get a new plotter....
I recommend that anyone looking at spending 5 figures on a plotter have a long look at an electrostatic model like the Kip 3000. You will spend more upfront but save on cartridges - maybe enough to make the payments. And the speed is no contest. These things will spit out a full size plot in about 5 seconds.

 
Posted : December 24, 2013 12:44 pm
(@cptdent)
Posts: 2089
Member
Topic starter
 

Would you believe that, in some cities, electrostatic plotters are a no-no and their output is considered as "hazardous waste". Thank a tree hugger if you live in one of those areas.

 
Posted : December 24, 2013 1:04 pm
(@the-pseudo-ranger)
Posts: 2369
Member
 

Electrostatic printing is used in laser printers, copy machines, and fax machines. I have to question your belief that any city has banned those devices. Can you name a city so I can look into this?

 
Posted : December 24, 2013 6:57 pm

Page 1 / 2