AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Trimble TBC - floats on post processed kinematic

5 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
909 Views
MISSOURIMULE
(@missourimule)
Posts: 30
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I am in the process of doing a post-process kinematic survey. I noticed some floats on my points. What can be done to eliminate the floats without redoing the field work? For instance, eliminating satellites? What else could I do? Thanks for all your reply's.


 
Posted : July 9, 2015 2:04 pm
john-hamilton
(@john-hamilton)
Posts: 3438
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I have found with TBC there is not a lot you can do. In the older processors I would raise the elevation mask to 15 and then 18.


 
Posted : July 9, 2015 2:16 pm
Kris Morgan
(@kris-morgan)
Posts: 3855
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

MISSOURIMULE, post: 326532, member: 9473 wrote: I am in the process of doing a post-process kinematic survey. I noticed some floats on my points. What can be done to eliminate the floats without redoing the field work? For instance, eliminating satellites? What else could I do? Thanks for all your reply's.

John is WAY more versed with TBC than me; however, when I run into an issue like you have, AND I've collected at least 10 minutes of data for under 10k and a minute per kilometer thereafter, I use the session editor. Right click on the base line and it will give you the option to open the session editor. From there, you can trim cycle slips. Finally, if that doesn't help, process the baseline and hit the report button. In that report, you will notice several graphs that show sigma values AND the time corresponding to the graph. On the rare occasions where one gives me a ration of crap, I generally notice that the data in some part is VERY NOISY and when I trim that time out of ALL SV's, then it processes quite well and I move on with the work.

Hope it helps.


 
Posted : July 9, 2015 3:32 pm
Kris Morgan
(@kris-morgan)
Posts: 3855
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

John Hamilton, post: 326536, member: 640 wrote: I have found with TBC there is not a lot you can do. In the older processors I would raise the elevation mask to 15 and then 18.

John, you can change the mask in the processor in TBC under the project settings.


 
Posted : July 9, 2015 3:32 pm
john-hamilton
(@john-hamilton)
Posts: 3438
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Kris Morgan, post: 326556, member: 29 wrote: John, you can change the mask in the processor in TBC under the project settings.

Kris: what I meant was that it didn't seem to help as much. In the early processors, raising the mask made a lot of difference. As the software developed, i think the deleting of poor observations at low elevation angles was more and more automatic. So changing the mask now seems to have little effect.


 
Posted : July 9, 2015 4:32 pm