AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Survnet Problems

7 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
554 Views
ease
 ease
(@ease)
Posts: 207
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Trying out a demo of Survnet and trying to close a big loop, 59 setups. Horizontal only.

Keep getting this error :

Here's the start of my rw5

[inlinecode]JB,NM11-3-14,DT11-03-2014,TM15:34:58
MO,AD0,UN2,SF1.00000000,EC0,EO0.0,AU0
--SurvPC Version 4.00
--CRD: Alphanumeric
--
--Equipment: Leica Robotic Total Station, TS12
--TS Scale: 1.00000000
--Scale Point not used
--EDM Mode: Standard
--P.C. mm Applied: -30.0000 (-30mm:backsight)
--P.C. mm Applied: -11.3000 (Leica 360:foresight)
--P.C. mm Applied: -30.0000 (-30mm:backsight)
--Set Collection with Obs Order 123...321...
CSE,N!,E!,EL*,AZ*
SP,PN1,N 752205.8100,E 1159155.2400,EL406.2000,--SPK1
SP,PN2,N 753206.0300,E 1159047.3800,EL311.1200,--SPK2
--SP,PN3,N 753316.7687,E 1159379.7931,EL0.0,--SPK3
CSE,N#,E#,EL*,AZ*
OC,OP2,N 753206.0300,E 1159047.3800,EL311.1200,--SPK2
LS,HI5.570,HR6.960
BK,OP2,BP1,BS,BC0.0000
LS,HI5.570,HR6.960
BD,OP2,FP1,AR0.0000,ZE5.2329,SD1010.494,--SPK1
LS,HI5.570,HR5.50
FD,OP2,FP3,AR257.4349,ZE358.5357,SD350.497,--SPK3
FR,OP2,FP3,AR77.4352,ZE181.0558,SD350.499,--SPK3
LS,HI5.570,HR6.960
BR,OP2,FP1,AR180.0005,ZE174.3628,SD1010.493,--SPK1
--Warning: Vertical Angles to backsight differ by 0°00'00".
--Warning: Horizontal Angles to foresight differ by 0°00'02".
--Warning: Vertical Angles to foresight differ by 0°00'05".
--SS,OP2,FP1,AR0.0000,ZE84.3629,SD1010.493430,--SPK1
--LS,HI5.570000,HR5.50000
--SS,OP2,FP3,AR257.4348,ZE91.0600,SD350.498015,--SPK3
--LS,HI5.570000,HR6.960000
--P.C. mm Applied: -11.3000 (Leica 360:foresight)
--P.C. mm Applied: -30.0000 (-30mm:backsight)
--P.C. mm Applied: -11.3000 (Leica 360:foresight)
--P.C. mm Applied: -30.0000 (-30mm:backsight)
--P.C. mm Applied: -11.3000 (Leica 360:foresight)
--P.C. mm Applied: -30.0000 (-30mm:backsight)
--Set Collection with Obs Order 123...321...
OC,OP2,N 753206.0300,E 1159047.3800,EL311.1200,--SPK2
LS,HI5.570,HR6.960
BK,OP2,BP1,BS,BC0.0000
LS,HI5.570,HR6.960
BD,OP2,FP1,AR0.0000,ZE5.2328,SD1010.495,--SPK1
LS,HI5.570,HR5.50
FD,OP2,FP105,AR355.3810,ZE0.0445,SD137.679,--IPIN105
FR,OP2,FP105,AR175.3809,ZE179.5503,SD137.680,--IPIN105
LS,HI5.570,HR6.960
[/inlinecode]

Any insight what I'm doing wrong based upon that? The bottom of that error message screen is reporting an AZ from 1-2 of 0 which is obviously incorrect but I can't see the line where that's being defined in the RW5. The crd file is generating correct coordinates.


 
Posted : November 26, 2014 10:17 am
RT Easy
(@rt-easy)
Posts: 64
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Random sample of one of my rw5 files:
OC,OP1,N 2941.220999,E 6563.459544,EL0.0,--
BK,OP1,BP5,******BS34.005221********,BC0.0000

Yours:
See the BS has no numbers behind it--
BK,OP2,BP1,*****BS*****,BC0.0000


 
Posted : November 26, 2014 10:43 am
Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 8310
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

You need to examine how points 32 through 36 are attached to your traverse before you worry about other stuff.

Trying to learn this with a 59 sided traverse is not the way I'd recommend you do it. In the words of Sensei Miyagi, "must walk before can run".


 
Posted : November 26, 2014 2:20 pm
Dan-Dunn
(@dan-dunn)
Posts: 366
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

All I can say is when I remove your angle sets (BD, BR, FD, FR) and turn on the side shots things start working

EDIT:

OK I think I have your problem.

In Your angle sets you have zenith angles of 5°, 358°, 181° & 174°. I believe these should be vertical angles. After I changed the codes from ZE to VA the file you posted starts to process.

You need to figure out why when you imported your data it assigned the ZE code and not the VA and/or why your instrument is using vertical angles for angle sets and then reporting zenith angles for the side shots. I don't use Leica so I can't help there.


 
Posted : November 26, 2014 2:38 pm
RoadBurner
(@roadburner)
Posts: 362
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> Random sample of one of my rw5 files:
> OC,OP1,N 2941.220999,E 6563.459544,EL0.0,--
> BK,OP1,BP5,******BS34.005221********,BC0.0000
>
> Yours:
> See the BS has no numbers behind it--
> BK,OP2,BP1,*****BS*****,BC0.0000

Yup. Had that happen to me.


 
Posted : November 26, 2014 3:32 pm

Good Enough
(@good-enough)
Posts: 4
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I've examined those points and the only thing different is I turned 32 in multiple sets instead of just one set. Don't know why that would confuse the program but who knows.


 
Posted : November 26, 2014 3:41 pm
ease
 ease
(@ease)
Posts: 207
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Thank you. That was it. I was messing around in the RW5 editor previously and had switched ZE to be displayed as VA just as a curiosity. It must save it to the rw5 instead of just being a display toggle.


 
Posted : November 26, 2014 4:10 pm