AI Assistant
Changing Geoid with...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Changing Geoid with existing control network --Easy way..

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
810 Views
stlsurveyor
(@stlsurveyor)
Posts: 2509
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

So I have a data set of about 250 control points covering about a 60 mile corridor of highway that were processed using Geoid09 and I suspect were leveled through with a DiNi level. I need to convert them to Geoid12B.?ÿ

Has anyone ever done this trough TBC by just changing the coordinate system? I will be able to run a DiNi level from at least two Vertical II monuments to spot check and handful for QA/QC. But if anyone knows a better (safer) way I am all ears...


N10,000, E7,000, Z100.00
PLS - IL, MO, AR, KS, MN, KY

 
Posted : April 10, 2019 7:55 am
Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 8310
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

If the elevations are determined by levelling why does a geoid model need to come into play?


 
Posted : April 10, 2019 8:10 am
spmpls
(@spmpls)
Posts: 660
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I don't understand the question? Hybrid geoid models are simply a mathematical model (N in H=h-N) between NAD83 ellipsoid heights and a gravimetric surface that is constrained (purposefully distorted) to NAVD88 leveled bench marks (orthometric heights). GEOID09 is coupled with the NAD83(NSRS2007) realization. GEOID12B is coupled with the NAD83(2011) realization. In is incorrect to pair them in any other way. Orthometric heights (H) don't change, only ellipsoid heights (h) and geoid heights (N) change with each realization.


 
Posted : April 10, 2019 8:13 am
MightyMoe
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 10534
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

You have XYZ information you wish to fix with GEOID 12B applied.

Then create a file in TBC with the correct projection parameters and GEOID12B as the model. Export the control to a XYZ file, then simply import your XYZ file into the new TBC project.?ÿ

This will "attach" Lat, Long, Ellipsoid height to the points.

You can also attempt to just update the existing file, I would be careful doing that, I've gotten some interesting results doing that across TSO, TGO and TBC. One thing that's cool is there is the undo button.?ÿ

Attaching GEOID12B to the current Ellipsoid height will change the Z value.?ÿ


 
Posted : April 10, 2019 8:39 am