Last seen: June 3, 2026 2:30 pm
Bill93, post: 362479, member: 87 wrote: I am among the many who earned his proclamation of "dippy idiot." Bill, I too was a "dippy idiot". IIRC, at ...
As much as folks like to wax nostalgic about Richard, he was very juvenile in his behavior when someone didn't agree with him. His tactics and name-ca...
paden cash, post: 360583, member: 20 wrote: That's unique...we call the fruit a hedge apple and the tree a 'boe-dark'. And the fruit is actually good ...
Scott Ellis, post: 360710, member: 7154 wrote: I do not see the point of adding fire lane to the final plat, because I do not know where the building ...
I wish Carlson would fix the issue of it wanting to default and sometimes switch (on its' own) to C&G alphanumeric when I have it set for Carlson ...
Holy Cow, post: 359217, member: 50 wrote: Fortunately, pincushions are rare where I work. Yes, it would be nice to be able to tell which is which. F...
Holy Cow, post: 359204, member: 50 wrote: Found a rusty circular piece of thin metal being held down by a round-headed screw of some sort with the hea...
Holy Cow, post: 359179, member: 50 wrote: Shawn has hit the nail on the head. The goal is to get the next surveyor or the client to the correct monum...
Holy Cow, post: 359157, member: 50 wrote: Found it, pfoolSet it, pfool Silent letters are so convenient. There are millions of FIP and SIP and imagina...
I'm always interested in different perspectives on surveying. Thank you for sharing Victor.
Nate The Surveyor, post: 359084, member: 291 wrote: Roun heah, we do Fip, or Sip! [sarcasm]Is that "FOUND IRON PIPE" or "SET IRON PIPE", or must som...
In 2009, this is what my letter to the Board said: I would also like to comment on subsection (d) of 663.17. Specifically, the following language: ÛÏ...
Shawn, I noticed the proposed Rule change as well. Your point regarding the inscription is the exact same thing I gave the Board feedback on during a ...
I have one. It works very well for topo in canopy.
LRWells, post: 346668, member: 7284 wrote: Thanks, that is a very judicious reply. Perhaps my memory has slipped, but I believe that Gary was the fi...
LRWells, post: 346656, member: 7284 wrote: Am I correct in concluding that Mr. Gilley was not the subject investigator? Considering that there have ...
Kent McMillan, post: 346596, member: 3 wrote: I'm hoping that wasn't Garey Gilley. He has been known to call a surveyor I know well asking about getti...
Another story pertinent to this discussion; I was attending an Ethics CEU class a few years ago being taught by the former Board investigator. We came...
Oh my. Hard to believe.