It has been over 100 here pretty much every day for the past month and we have been in the field 27 of the last 33 days.We have had many days over 105...

We don't use a bipod. Our work doesn't have to be that precise. Without bracing it is impossible to hold the rover rod still enough for the calibratio...

Thanks. Yes I think the RTX OPUS comparison is good. I just was having problems converting ellipsoidal heights to elevations.?ÿ OPUS was back up again...

It does and I have it loaded but I am not sure how to manually convert heights like that. I think it uses the good model for its internal calculations...

Yes I saw OPUS was back up. I just submitted the files. Have not got them back yet.?ÿ I don't have TBC. I do pretty much everything in the data collec...

Yes - I am using R10.

Posted by: MightyMoe The basis is what created the stakeout points. This is why site control is important. Why have a 16' HI on a shed roof? What are ...

After I had the opus solution I created a brand new job and imported the base coordinates as a csv.?ÿ

I agree about where to measure and being careful but screwing that up wouldn't cause the message I am getting.?ÿ I start the base and it starts normal...

So I guess a possible solution or thing to try is to set my antenna height to zero on the data collector and add 15.917 feet to the OPUS solution elev...

The base is 4.8514 meters ARP. I enter it into the data collector as 191 inches which it displays as 15.917 sft Interestingly this .8514 meters is 2.7...

Thanks for the replies. I never thought of using a 0 (or near 0) ARP. That would make things slick.?ÿ I did the feet to meters conversions and don't s...

Exactly as Lee said. Then go measure your control point and then select site calibration. Done it thousands of times.