AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

The case of the remorseful subdivider

5 Posts
5 Users
3 Reactions
1,178 Views
holy-cow
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 26037
Member P&R, Founder
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The project was to create a six-lot subdivision of a metes and bounds tract inside of a city.  The subdivider lived on what became one of the lots.  A cul-de-sac allowed access for the other lots.  He was looking to make some quick money so he didn't set the lot price as high as he might have.  Within a few weeks he sold all five other lots to a single buyer.  That buyer was a quasi-governmental agency that provided government-subsidized assistance in various forms.

The result was the construction of five identical single-family houses that filled with single mother with children occupants.  They paid a low rental fee to occupy the houses with no utility expenses and no responsibilty for lawn care or building maintenance.  The subdivider soon found unattended children on his property with some going through his possessions, especially in his garage.  Before long, he reached his breaking point, bought a different house outside of the city and moved out of "HIS" neighborhood.  His longterm neighbors were very upset to the point they wouldn't even talk to him or his wife.


 
Posted : September 19, 2026 4:53 pm
1
GaryG
(@gary_g)
Posts: 977
Member
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Covenants and Resrtrictions 


 
Posted : September 19, 2026 6:05 pm
1
pls8xx
(@pls8xx)
Posts: 178
Member
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

GaryG is on-target for what could have been done, but with restrictions, it might have been a long time selling the lots.

I don't know wether to call this "Be careful what you wish for, you might get it"

Or maybe "No good deed goes unpunished." After all, six needy families now have a home.


 
Posted : September 20, 2026 11:43 am
Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 8491
Member P&R, Founder
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'm not sure what kind of (constitutional) CC&Rs one could write to prevent this sort of thing. Better to enter into an agreement with a builder and construct and sell homes instead of selling vacant lots. 


 
Posted : September 21, 2026 9:38 am
1
rankin_file
(@rankin_file)
Posts: 4142
Member Sustainer
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I would think an owner occupancy / no renters covenant would be viable.


 
Posted : September 21, 2026 9:47 am