AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Star*Net Support on Feature Codes

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
870 Views
amdomag
(@amdomag)
Posts: 654
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Hi guys!

I am wondering if Star*Net is going to support Feature Codes in the future.

Good day.. 🙂


 
Posted : April 20, 2012 7:13 pm
Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 8310
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Starnet is now owned by Microsurvey and the Microsurvey product certainly supports feature codes. Possibly you might see starnet functionality packaged into Microsurvey someday, but I doubt you would see the reverse happening.


 
Posted : April 20, 2012 9:29 pm
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 11990
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I guess I don't understand that question.

How does StarNet not support codes now?

I mean if I process the raw data through StarNet it creates a final coordinate list with all of the feature codes attached to each point. Then you import that into MicroSurvey, Carlson Survey or Civil 3D and process and your software should do the field to finish at that point.

Maybe you mean you want StarNet to process the autotopo?


 
Posted : April 20, 2012 9:43 pm
Kent McMillan
(@kent-mcmillan)
Posts: 11416
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> I guess I don't understand that question.
>
> How does StarNet not support codes now?
>
> I mean if I process the raw data through StarNet it creates a final coordinate list with all of the feature codes attached to each point.

Yes, that's the way Star*Net has worked for years. The problem Ardel is asking about mey be related to converting some specific data collector file format to Star*Net input format.


 
Posted : April 20, 2012 11:41 pm
amdomag
(@amdomag)
Posts: 654
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Reformatting point descriptions to effect Field to Finish in Civil 3D is a waste of time in my opinion. Why not support SurvCE feature codes, for example, to generate line features in Star*Net. LandXML it after to universalize the data. At least, looking at the Star*Net screen with line features provides more meaningful platform than purely with points, ss lines, and traverse lines.

How long will it take for those vendors to meet somewhere and universalize Field to Finish codes?


 
Posted : April 28, 2012 4:37 pm