AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Question regarding FAA 1A surveys

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
882 Views
Williwaw
(@williwaw)
Posts: 3642
Member P&R, Founder
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'm working on 4 proposed wireless tower sites right now. In the preliminary design and permitting stage and I've been asked to provide FAA 1A letters on the 4 locations, prior to any clearing or construction dirt work, much less a final design. Some of these sites are not GPS friendly at all until there has been at least clearing done and I'm just a little concerned. All the ones I've done up until now have been on existing towers. I'm a bit loath to certify an elevation and GP on something that's still on the chalk board.

Is this standard practice?


Just because I'm paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get me.

 
Posted : February 4, 2016 2:20 pm
dcn
 dcn
(@david-c-newell-rpls-ls-cfm)
Posts: 142
Free
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Williwaw, post: 356589, member: 7066 wrote: I'm working on 4 proposed wireless tower sites right now. In the preliminary design and permitting stage and I've been asked to provide FAA 1A letters on the 4 locations, prior to any clearing or construction dirt work, much less a final design. Some of these sites are not GPS friendly at all until there has been at least clearing done and I'm just a little concerned. All the ones I've done up until now have been on existing towers. I'm a bit loath to certify an elevation and GP on something that's still on the chalk board.

Is this standard practice?

We do them and label them as proposed.

Attached files

BRIDleCREEK 1A .pdf (33.7 KB) 


 
Posted : February 4, 2016 2:44 pm
Williwaw
(@williwaw)
Posts: 3642
Member P&R, Founder
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

David C. Newell RPLS LS CFM, post: 356595, member: 6347 wrote: We do them and label them as proposed.

Makes perfect sense. Thanks!


Just because I'm paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get me.

 
Posted : February 4, 2016 3:09 pm
jkmonroe
(@jkmonroe)
Posts: 41
Free
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

A 2C would also work (depending on your requirements). This gives you a little more leeway on the accuracy of the position. It's been a few years since I've done one, but it seemed like we would do a 2C "Proposed" for a planned site and then come back and measure the completed tower to do the tighter accuracy required 1A.


 
Posted : February 4, 2016 3:50 pm
Ron Lang
(@ron-lang)
Posts: 320
Free
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I prepare them all the time, i label it proposed structure, with lat, long & elev.


 
Posted : February 4, 2016 4:05 pm