Received this morning from the Coalition To Save Our GPS:
====================================================================================
HELP SAVE OUR GPS!
Please Submit your Comments to the FCC by March 1
Background
We have very important, and encouraging, news to report on the LightSquared saga. On February 15, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued a Public Notice proposing that it:
1) Withdraw the January 2011 waiver that allowed LightSquared to proceed with its planned wireless network; and
2) Modify LightSquared’s satellite license to prohibit LightSquared from building any ground-based wireless network.
This FCC decision was brought about, in large part, by two additional interference studies released by the Federal government on February 14. These reports ( http://www.gps.gov/news/2012/02/lightsquared/) clearly demonstrate that LightSquared’s network interferes with GPS and that there are no practical fixes to solve that interference.
This is a great step forward for protecting GPS from interference. But, it is not the final step. The FCC is now seeking public comment on its two proposals, and we need your help.
We ask that you write the FCC applauding it for making the two proposals contained in the Public Notice, which if adopted would prohibit LightSquared from buildings its wireless network, and strongly urging the FCC to adopt both proposals. The FCC has asked for public comments by March 1. Although comments can be submitted up until the time that the FCC makes a formal decision on the matter, we urge you to write as soon as possible.
What can I do?
Everyone who cares about GPS should let the FCC know that the facts are now clear -- LightSquared cannot be allowed to move forward. In writing to the FCC, we encourage you to cover the following points in your own words:
- How you use GPS technology in your business and/or personal life.
- What would happen to your business/personal life if GPS became unavailable or unreliable.
- While more capacity for wireless broadband services is important, it should not come at the expense of GPS, which is critical to our country’s economy.
- All of the engineering studies conducted, including those recently released by the government agency in charge of federal radio spectrum management, clearly show that LightSquared’s proposed network causes interference and that there are no remedies to fix this interference.
- The FCC should formally adopt its proposed recommendations and deny LightSquared the authority to offer any ground-based wireless network.
How do I tell the FCC to save GPS?
The FCC has an easy-to-use portal on its website to submit feedback on the Public Notice:
(1) Click on this link for the FCC’s Electronic Comments Filing System (ECFS): http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/upload/begin?procName=&filedFrom=X
(2) In the box which says “Proceeding Number,” type: 11-109. It is important to include this docket number with your comments.
(3) In the designated boxes, enter (a) your name or your company’s name, and (b) your mailing address/city/state/zip.
(4) In the box which says “Type in or paste your brief comments,” do so. Click “Continue”.
(5) A review page will load listing all of the information entered. If correct, click “Confirm.” (6) If you have trouble, contact the FCC ECFS Helpdesk at 202-418-0193 or e-mail at [email protected].
Thanks to you and your organizations, we have made tremendous strides in dealing with this very serious threat to the viability of GPS. Please bear in mind that it’s not over yet, and that these comments can have a real impact on the FCC’s decision-making. Thank you.
###
Like what we do here? Donate
Need a new or refreshed website? Five Point Web Solutions
Looking for a web host? Website Hosting & Management
Save Our GPS: LightSquared Update 2/16/12
Wall Street Journal today says that LightSquared is now considering suing the FCC.
Save Our GPS: LightSquared Update 2/16/12
> Wall Street Journal today says that LightSquared is now considering suing the FCC.
They better be careful. The FCC can prosecute them for lying to the government.
Save Our GPS: LightSquared Update 2/16/12
Incredible how many times companies get bad advice from professional consultants.
Save Our GPS: LightSquared Update 2/16/12
> Incredible how many times companies get bad advice from professional consultants.
Well, this guy's not giving up:
Falcone Sounds Defiant Note on LightSquared
Hard to feel bad for a guy that made billions by fueling the housing collapse ...
Saw a blurb on TV last night about how easy it is to block GPS signals used for navigation using a simple device plugged into a lighter socket in a car. A real scare presentation and I wondered at the time if this is a back door attempt by Lightsquared to influence the requirement for shields on all GPS receivers. Later after legislation gets approved to protect us by requiring filters they can conduct a new interference test and then obtain licensing. Big money or government cannot be trusted when they have their sights set on such a large profit potential and have competition stopped by a government agency such as FCC.
jud
Considering that the "lower 10" interference can be mitigated due to the fact that it is not immediately adjacent to the GPS frequency, it is adjacent to somebody's frequency. I'm curious as to who is adjacent to the "lower 10" and if interference is an issue with them.
James
> Saw a blurb on TV last night about how easy it is to block GPS signals used for navigation using a simple device plugged into a lighter socket in a car. A real scare presentation and I wondered at the time if this is a back door attempt by Lightsquared to influence the requirement for shields on all GPS receivers.
The jammers don't transmit on a frequency adjacent to GPS; they transmit right on it (L1, I expect). If you filter out the jammers, you filter out GPS along with it, so filtering isn't the solution to that problem.
Geez, this LightSquared bunch is like a FemBot from the Austin Powers movies. Attractive to some, evil to us and you can't kill it.:-|
That's actually why we've had "frequency ranges", and the area around GPS has been reserved for low-powered satellite communications, whereas other ranges are allocated for higher-powered broadcasts.
Filters work to a degree, assuming they don't get overwhelmed by a much-higher powered broadcast right next-door. And the more accurate your filter, the more it costs. But at the moment, even Javad is having a hard time showing that he can create an accurate-enough filter to even work, given the huge disparity in adjacent signal strengths, despite his huge ad campaign.
Even though LS2 is asking the FCC for an extension, people should still try to file before the 1st just in case
submission done.
Done and done. Freakin' LSQ zombies.
Rick
posted
