AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Bad LOMA?

8 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
1,236 Views
sergeant-schultz
(@sergeant-schultz)
Posts: 957
Free
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

What do you do when the LOMA on the house next door removes it from the SFHA, but is totally bogus as far as BFE and LAG are concerned, such that if the BFE and LAG were correct, the structure would not have been removed?


 
Posted : May 5, 2017 1:21 pm
Jim in AZ
(@jim-in-az)
Posts: 3374
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Discuss it with my local FEMA Floodplain Administrator.


 
Posted : May 5, 2017 1:38 pm
thebionicman
(@thebionicman)
Posts: 4529
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Sergeant Schultz, post: 427007, member: 315 wrote: What do you do when the LOMA on the house next door removes it from the SFHA, but is totally bogus as far as BFE and LAG are concerned, such that if the BFE and LAG were correct, the structure would not have been removed?

First order of business is check your work. Being wrong sucks more after you publish it.
If i knew who did the work i would call them and talk. An insurance company will come after them if they pay a claim. An owner will come after them if they dropped flood insurance due to a misleading LOMA. At the end of the day the LOMA wont cause or stop a flood but it will change who pays for a loss.


 
Posted : May 5, 2017 5:55 pm
sergeant-schultz
(@sergeant-schultz)
Posts: 957
Free
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

thebionicman, post: 427054, member: 8136 wrote: First order of business is check your work.

[SARCASM]Wow, shoulda thought of that myself[/SARCASM]

Sorry, couldn't resist.

No idea who did the work; really don't want to spend the time to track it down, though I strongly suspect a local RTK wizard. What's got me PO'd is having to explain to my guy why he's still in the SFHA, & the neighbor, with a nearly identical LAG (per my DOUBLE-checked-and-verified-against-recent LIDAR-data measurements) is out.

Also, imagine how popular I'll be if I cause an existing LOMA to be rescinded.


 
Posted : May 6, 2017 8:43 am
FL/GA PLS
(@flga-pls)
Posts: 7403
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Sometimes it's just best to leave sleeping dogs alone. 😉


 
Posted : May 6, 2017 10:29 am

larry-scott
(@larry-scott)
Posts: 1059
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Sergeant Schultz, post: 427007, member: 315 wrote: What do you do when the LOMA on the house next door removes it from the SFHA, but is totally bogus as far as BFE and LAG are concerned, such that if the BFE and LAG were correct, the structure would not have been removed?

Quick Q:
What are the abbreviations?


 
Posted : May 15, 2017 9:37 pm
FrozenNorth
(@frozennorth)
Posts: 711
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Larry Scott, post: 428461, member: 8766 wrote: Quick Q:
What are the abbreviations?

LOMA: Letter of Map Amendment
BFE: Base Flood Elevation
LAG: Lowest Adjacent Grade


 
Posted : May 15, 2017 9:53 pm
hpalmer
(@hpalmer)
Posts: 513
Member P&R, Founder
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

just 'suck it up'. We had to do same more than once where adjacent parcels were removed and were lower than my Client. Check your data but also check into other data. RTK could be/should be tied to a high accuracy reference point. Who checked the LIDAR elevations relative to local benchmarks and to HARN? Your elevations could both be correct, just tied to different datum or reference points.


 
Posted : May 16, 2017 6:09 am