AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

CAD standards

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
622 Views
hack
 hack
(@hack)
Posts: 275
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

We have a project with the following requirement

Section 4 -Survey in electronic media requirements:
Provide the information on a CD or other secure electronic media.
Survey in electronic media shall meet the requirements of the United States National CAD Standard (NCS)-Version 6.0 as follows:

1. Any user may define a User Definable or Unassigned Level. Submit revised level list.
2.Provide the level schedule (indicating levels and descriptions actually used) within the CAD drawing file along with a hard copy.

Anyone have any experience with this?

Thanks in advance.

Hack


 
Posted : September 30, 2016 11:55 am
Mark Mayer
(@mark-mayer)
Posts: 3371
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I read that as saying that if you make a new layer not in the US National CAD standard you have to tell them you did it.


 
Posted : September 30, 2016 4:15 pm
john-putnam
(@john-putnam)
Posts: 2432
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The National CAD Standard is a joke. The idea is great, don't get me wrong, but the fact that you have to pay a not so insignificant sum of money to get a copy is a real limiting factor to its effectiveness.


 
Posted : October 6, 2016 8:53 am
Dallas
(@dallas-morlan)
Posts: 769
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

John Putnam, post: 394158, member: 1188 wrote: The National CAD Standard is a joke. The idea is great, don't get me wrong, but the fact that you have to pay a not so insignificant sum of money to get a copy is a real limiting factor to its effectiveness.

There is a free option that is National CAD standard compliant. The https://cadbimcenter.erdc.dren.mil/default.aspx?p=a&t=1&i=7&apos ;">U.S. Department of Defense A/E/C Standard that has been mentioned here a number of times The following is from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CAD BIM Technology Center (linked above) web site:

[INDENT]The A/E/C CAD Standard and A/E/C Graphics Standard documents have been developed by the CAD/BIM Technology Center to eliminate redundant Computer-Aided Design (CAD) standardization efforts within the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Federal Government. These documents are part of an initiative to develop a nonproprietary CAD standard that incorporates existing industry, national, and international standards and to develop data standards that address the entire life cycle of facilities within the DoD.[/INDENT]

Documentation and files for both AutoCAD and Microstation are available for download from the site.


 
Posted : October 6, 2016 9:30 am
jkinak
(@jkinak)
Posts: 378
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

When the architects took the AIA Cad Standard and rebranded it the "National CAD Standard" there was a lot of push by those that don't work with CAD much to adopt it for civil projects. Hey... It's the National CAD Standard after all. The COE went in and tweaked it to develop their version of the "National CAD Standard" (as Dallas has linked) - it's better for civil/survey than the non-COE version of the "National CAD Standard". In V5 (at least that's when I first noticed it) they added VN for survey node (points) - that was good. I really like the flexibility of the "Standard" e.g. "1. Any user may define a User Definable or Unassigned Level." I like a Standard that is unique to each user.

When the architects co-opted the term "National CAD Standard" our firm took direct action and moved to the Galactic CAD Standard... It's clearly better than the National or even Global CAD Standard...I know, we'll be second to the Universal CAD Standard when it comes out but we're not know-it-alls.


 
Posted : October 6, 2016 4:18 pm