Reading RPLS is free for the whole profession. Members post, reply, and get the members-only rooms.
Quick question.
We recently wrote a short, fictional story about “Gus the Surveyor”. A composite of situations we have seen in real survey offices. Looking at how much time spreadsheets quietly consume as jobs, billing, and schedules get busier.
Just a thought exercise using real-world scenarios we have seen:
Real Cost of Managing Surveys with Spreadsheets (Spoiler: It's More Than You Think)
Curious how this lines up with your experience:
-
At what point did spreadsheets become more pain than help?
-
Did you replace them, refine them, or just live with the overhead?
- Any other comments regarding the pains of Excel?
As the owner/operator of a very small business (no employees, annual billings usually less than $250k), your article wasn't really directed at me, so my comments aren't really germane. However, I throw them out anyway:
1. Spreadsheets remain much more helpful than painful. I use them for preparing estimates and invoices, and on larger projects for tracking various aspects of the work.
2. I live with the overhead, because it's well worth the cost.
3. I haven't used Excel in years, because LibreOffice Calc does everything I've ever needed to do in Excel. It reads .xslx files without complaint, and replicates every Excel command and formula structure that I've ever encountered. And it costs me only as much as I care to donate on occasion.
All our administrative processes are done with Xcel. From timesheets, billing, filing, even super simple ones like bidding.
If your spreadsheets are insufficiently complex to deal with the task, it's not the fault of the spreadsheet.
If your spreadsheets are insufficiently complex to deal with the task, it's not the fault of the spreadsheet.
This. Spreadsheets are tools, any inefficiencies come from poor use of them.
Reminds me of a crew chief that once said to me "I don't know why the data collector did that." I do, because you told it to.