Reading RPLS is free for the whole profession. Members post, reply, and get the members-only rooms.
@rover83 ?ÿ I agree that the document and excerpt I posted would not provide calibration information.?ÿThe linked document refers to the sites being...
There is this from Canada:/p> ?ÿ
link is to the ATOM reference manual... the document?ÿ
@david-kendall Perhaps the following might be useful.br>You mention surveying approaches; what about transitional surfaces. The page linked above inc...
Due to increasingly characteristic carelessness on my part, I screwed up the computation using the UNAVCO tool. I used West rather than East longitude...
Another hopefully useful graphic from Penn State taken from GPS for Land Surveyors:
Adding to the good information already posted,I add the following screen captures. They show the geoid-ellipsoid separation using the GEOID18, USGG201...
FWIW, Publishing as Open Access in the JofG involves a 3,280(USD) article-processing fee.?ÿ
@jitterboogie article comes up on my system using Google search ??geophysics v geodetic featherstone? ?ÿ
I can also recommend: Note that you can buy chapters individually. ?ÿ
@jitterboogie I liked this paper by another Aussie (though English) Professor, Will Featherstone, on differences between geophysical and geodetic stu...
@notsomuch Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.
@frozennorth i really enjoyed his Navigation course which is part of the OpenCourseWar project.?ÿ
I used the text below for an undergraduate course on geodesy. I considered it to be a gentle introduction to the science. Nary a triple integral... ...