You know the answer. The question is: why the heck did I give a lump sum bid on this thing?Just guessing here. They may not know themselves and are ...

A Texas-based AnswerI imagine most states have codified it by now. NY has similar statutes.If there's an issue it's usually with the distribution fac...

Utilities are usually held to be an allowed use of the public R.O.W.The agreements you see have to do with the utility not interfering with existing u...

It also can get more complicated when dealing with manmade lakes. For instance, was the water in 1920 at a level because of a Dam at that time? And ...

If it's non-navigable it could be owned all by one or shared by all. I'll give Frank the benefit of the doubt and go with his original statement. Th...

Well, it is like golfing. My only wonder is we don't have to pay the client for the privilege yet. After all, equipments paid for, working (playing)...

That may all be true, but I say all the evidence is not lost and I can retrace it. You say no way the line is now 100 feet in some other direction. ...

Mediation, arbitration, agreements, second opinions, and ajudication are all currently available options.So the question is why none of it works very ...

Well, I know it's kind of a novel approach in the U.S., but I would think it possible to teach some people the requisite laws and such to enable them ...

But this was not a case of going out and correcting back. The variations are given for locational purpose but are not actual differing variations for...

He seems to have retraced and run a line that holds the subdivision corners on the south township line per plan, but holds the corresponding northerly...

True enough. But it does combine an evidentiary report with a property description. In the course of a retracement survey we know there are usually m...

As a surveyor I like the description. If I were an attorney I could make a career out of it. Just too much there to argue about for those not in the...

Ahh, if only it were that simple.The presumption that a call goes to the center of a monument is rebuttable. And in fact is not even a presumption wh...

Umm, I don't get it. Could you elaborate on that?