Notifications
Clear all

WTC1 Tallest Building in Western Hemisphere

18 Posts
14 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@scott-zelenak)
Posts: 600
Registered
Topic starter
 

With the addition of several Spire sections, WTC1 is now the tallest building in the Western Hemisphere, standing at 1,470 feet above ground level.

Looks big, right.
How about a little perspective.

Three men set a 15 foot tall window panel.

 
Posted : February 26, 2013 4:30 pm
(@dougie)
Posts: 7889
Registered
 

> Looks big, right....

Looks AWESOME!

Thanks for posting here Scott, you da man!

Cheers,

Radar

 
Posted : February 26, 2013 4:35 pm
(@scott-zelenak)
Posts: 600
Registered
Topic starter
 

The Spire...up close.

Some of it is hidden below the derrick deck...

 
Posted : February 26, 2013 5:18 pm
(@bl-hindman)
Posts: 103
Registered
 

SWEET!

LOVE IT!!!!!

 
Posted : February 26, 2013 5:22 pm
 BigE
(@bige)
Posts: 2694
Registered
 

Wow!
No way I could handle those heights without passing right out.

I would have figured they would have hung all the glass panels by now.

BTW: that's some really nice resolution you have on that camera Scott.
E

 
Posted : February 26, 2013 5:34 pm
(@dave-lindell)
Posts: 1683
 

The Spire...up close.

Somebody has to ask: How do they get the cranes down when they are done?

(We don't see much high rise construction here in quakely land.)

 
Posted : February 26, 2013 5:39 pm
(@joe-the-surveyor)
Posts: 1948
Registered
 

Sheesh, from up there you can see me waving to you in CT!!...lol

 
Posted : February 26, 2013 5:46 pm
(@mjmoran)
Posts: 30
Registered
 

But is it plumb???

But is it plumb ?? 🙂 Thanks for the great photos, Scott.

 
Posted : February 26, 2013 6:02 pm
(@paul-in-pa)
Posts: 6044
Registered
 

Plumb Or Straight, Cannot Have Both

Because of the height of the WTC, the plumb line varies.

We did the math on the original WTC when I was in college, but I could not do it now.

Paul in PA

 
Posted : February 26, 2013 6:29 pm
(@paul-in-pa)
Posts: 6044
Registered
 

Getting The Crane Down

The photo shows 2 cranes on top. A derrick near the corner, that lifts things to the deck and a tower crane that takes things from the deck to the spire.

Typical tall building crane dissassembly is to dismantle the tower crane and lower it via the derrick. Then a smaller derrick is lifted up and used to dismantle and lower the larger one. At some stage in the WTC process a derrick will be used to dismantle the exterior elevator. The last derrick has to be small enough that when dismantled it can come down in an interior elevator.

Scott,

I do not recall that an exterior elevator was used on WTC 1 or 2, but I only visited after the towers were topped out. We were up to the 74th? floor North tower via interior elevators and that floor was just a shell with windows. I believe the tower was occupied to the first sky lobby.

Question, is this the highest elevation for an exterior elevator?

Is that elevator strong enough to carry the weight on it's columns or are the loads cantilevered off the main building?

Paul in PA

 
Posted : February 26, 2013 6:46 pm
(@dave-lindell)
Posts: 1683
 

Getting The Crane Down

The exterior cranes here are self-climbing. (Up and down.)

 
Posted : February 26, 2013 10:14 pm
(@ken-salzmann)
Posts: 625
Registered
 

Plumb Or Straight, Cannot Have Both

> Because of the height of the WTC, the plumb line varies.
>
Paul - can you elaborate without getting into the math?

Ken

 
Posted : February 27, 2013 6:44 am
(@bill93)
Posts: 9834
 

Plumb Or Straight, Cannot Have Both

Or with math, if you can find it.

 
Posted : February 27, 2013 7:02 am
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25292
 

Plumb Or Straight, Cannot Have Both

Wouldn't the building need to grow wider as it went higher?

 
Posted : February 27, 2013 7:26 am
(@bill93)
Posts: 9834
 

Plumb Or Straight, Cannot Have Both

I calculate about 65 parts per million wider (0.007 per 100 ft base width) at 1400 ft height, based on the radius from center of earth.

The potential curvature of the plumb line would also be very small and depend (I think) only on the irregularities in gravity. There wouldn't necessarily be any curvature if gravity was uniform in the area.

 
Posted : February 27, 2013 7:50 am
(@paul-landau)
Posts: 215
Registered
 

What a shot!!! Thanks for posting, glad I stopped in today.

 
Posted : February 27, 2013 11:17 am
(@stlsurveyor)
Posts: 2490
Registered
 

That's the best picture I've seen in a long time - hands down.

 
Posted : February 28, 2013 1:26 pm
(@brad-ott)
Posts: 6185
Registered
 

The Spire...up close.

Thanks Scott. I wore my tee shirt with pride at the local bowling alley last night.

 
Posted : February 28, 2013 1:41 pm