AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

The boundary corner for Georgia, Alabama and Tennessee.

7 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
343 Views
DEREK G. GRAHAM OLS OLIP
(@derek-g-graham-ols-olip)
Posts: 2054
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Anyone have an extra post they wish to place ?

http://onlineathens.com/opinion/2012-01-09/editorial-boundary-dispute-pointless-pursuit

😉
YOS

TNAI


 
Posted : January 12, 2012 6:03 pm
Guest
(@guest)
Posts: 1651
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Hmmm.....

1818, about the time of the PLSS First Meridian Survey (Ohio).

Baseline defined as 41 degrees north. But today that established baseline appears to be about 3900 feet too far south. Looks like a lot of surveying work coming up fixing all of those erroneous townships. Looks like we get another chunk of Michigan.


 
Posted : January 12, 2012 8:05 pm
Pin Cushion
(@pin-cushion)
Posts: 475
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Atlanta is running out of water... if the corner gets deemed in the Tennessee River (which it won't) they think they can pipe water to the city.

... wasted money


 
Posted : January 13, 2012 8:11 am
john-hamilton
(@john-hamilton)
Posts: 3438
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I don't really know anything about this case, but if a monument was set in 1818, right or "wrong", isn't that where the corner is today?


 
Posted : January 13, 2012 8:29 am
ctompkins
(@ctompkins)
Posts: 614
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The irony to the whole situation is that the survey in question was solicited by the state of Georgia, which meant they provided the equipment. In comes the sextant. The 'Great State of Georgia' gave the surveyor a SEXTANT!! considering the equipment, he actually did a very good job. Our student chapter of SAMSOG did a paper on this for credit or money and I would have to dig up the paperwork.


 
Posted : January 13, 2012 9:08 am

The Pseudo Ranger
(@the-pseudo-ranger)
Posts: 2367
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Generally, monuments set by the GLO are "indisputable" if you can prove that you recovered the original monument or properly reestablished the original position.

This could be interesting, though. It depends on whether you believe the state line was created by the words on the page (at a certain geodetic position), or by the monuments that were intended to mark that position.

I’m not sure that normal surveying rules would apply to resolving a dispute over a state line, and it would apparently take an act of Congress to resolve a dispute. But my guess is that they hold the existing line.


 
Posted : January 13, 2012 12:26 pm
bradl
(@bradl)
Posts: 234
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

This is interesting. If I'm not mistaken, Georgia was carved out of the original Carolina Charter. Would grantor/grantee relationship apply where the grantee is the benefactor of potential discrepancies or would it be more along the line of US Government/patentee relationship, where the discrepancy goes to the US Government? Now, was Carolina under the rule of the Crown and would England rights apply or did they recognize themselves as independent.

Also, Pseudo brought up an interesting point of was the survey an "orignal survey" or just the first survey.

I agree this will not go anywhere, but it is sure fun to think of.


 
Posted : January 13, 2012 12:43 pm