AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

SurvNet User Group

6 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
462 Views
Mark Mayer
(@mark-mayer)
Posts: 3371
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'm a longtime StarNet user. Recently I've acquired access to Carlson Survey 2020 and wish to learn how to use SurvNet.?ÿ I'm collecting data using a Topcon PS and Tesla/Magnet. I can output raw data from that in TDS .raw, SurvCE .rw5, C3d .fbk, or any of several other formats.

I like to orient my instrument using resectioning when doing topo. The resection ties are present in the raw data files - when I convert the raw data to StarNet .dat in StarNet they are there. But when I import them to SurvNet only the coordinate position comes over. True with any of the raw data formats I've tried so far. And that is not good enough, IMO. The common set-up-on-a point data comes over just fine.

So - before I elevate this to Carlson - I'd like to know if any of you who are using SurvNet have had this problem.?ÿ Is it just a Magnet thing? of is it SurvNet?

I'd also like to hear from you if you are a SurvNet user even if you aren't doing resectioning.?ÿ


 
Posted : October 25, 2020 5:23 pm
rundatline
(@rundatline)
Posts: 259
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

So far as I know a Carlson raw file only actively lists the new stored coordinate. The actual shot data and residuals are only stored as "notes".

You'll probably have to edit the raw file manually to get what you want.


 
Posted : October 26, 2020 4:32 am
totalsurv
(@totalsurv)
Posts: 810
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I use Survnet at the moment but have never used resection data. I have never been able to get Topcon data in correctly but have no problem with Trimble.

I am about to abandon Survnet for TBC as I have not been able to get an issue resolved and am sick of being treated like a crank by Carlson.

.


 
Posted : October 26, 2020 6:28 am
peter-lothian
(@peter-lothian)
Posts: 1226
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'm not familiar enough with Magnet data collection, but my guess is that it stores the resection measurements as notes, just as the Carlson data collection software does. The Star*Net conversion software is probably programmed to recognize this, whereas the Carlson office software does not. As Rundatline stated, you can manually edit the resection data from note records to observations. I find this to be a pain in the tookus, since the data in the note line is presented in a different order than in the measurement data line. (You have to swap zenith angle and slope distance positions, IIRC). I just have the field crew re-measure their resection shots, with new point numbers, since most of our resections are on small house lot surveys. I then re-number the measurements to match the control points.


 
Posted : October 26, 2020 6:42 am
ladd-nelson
(@ladd-nelson)
Posts: 738
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 
Posted by: @mark-mayer

I'm a longtime StarNet user. Recently I've acquired access to Carlson Survey 2020 and wish to learn how to use SurvNet.?ÿ I'm collecting data using a Topcon PS and Tesla/Magnet. I can output raw data from that in TDS .raw, SurvCE .rw5, C3d .fbk, or any of several other formats.

I like to orient my instrument using resectioning when doing topo. The resection ties are present in the raw data files - when I convert the raw data to StarNet .dat in StarNet they are there. But when I import them to SurvNet only the coordinate position comes over. True with any of the raw data formats I've tried so far. And that is not good enough, IMO. The common set-up-on-a point data comes over just fine.

So - before I elevate this to Carlson - I'd like to know if any of you who are using SurvNet have had this problem.?ÿ Is it just a Magnet thing? of is it SurvNet?

I'd also like to hear from you if you are a SurvNet user even if you aren't doing resectioning.?ÿ

My first question is which program is being used to "output raw data from that in TDS .raw, SurvCE .rw5, C3d .fbk, or any of several other formats"?

Since you indicated you have Carlson Survey, you might explore the Survey -- Edit-Process Raw Data command. From this command's dialog box, choose File -- Import and import the raw file as provided by the collector (e.g. *.raw format). Issue the File -- Save Raw As and save it to the RW5 format.

You should be able explore the data within SurvNET and use the RW5 for input in either of the Total Station Data or GPS Vector input areas.

I had re-worked the legacy interface of the SurvNET documentation in preparation for the Carlson 2020 release about 2 years ago and handed it off to my colleagues for the new interface it was given. Knowing there might be some out here who prefer the legacy interface, I'll be happy to provide the pre-change source HTML files (you can view them with a browser). Simply drop me an Email (lnelsonATcarlsonswDOTcom) and I'll point you to where you can find the content.


 
Posted : October 28, 2020 4:03 pm

Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 8310
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

@ladd-nelson

Thanks for chiming in, Ladd.

My first question is which program is being used to "output raw data from that in TDS .raw, SurvCE .rw5, C3d .fbk, or any of several other formats"?

The Data collector. ie/ Magnet software. I can out put the raw data file from it in any of a couple dozen file formats. Possibly there is an option among these that will work better in SurvNet? I should add that this is not unusual. I was able to do similarly from SP Survey Pro and Trimble Access.?ÿ

Since you indicated you have Carlson Survey, you might explore the Survey --?ÿEdit-Process Raw Data?ÿcommand. From this command's dialog box, choose File -- Import and import the raw file as provided by the collector (e.g.?ÿ*.raw format). Issue the File -- Save Raw As and save it to the RW5 format.

Yeeahh, been there, did that. No love.

I do suspect that this has something to do with what Magnet is outputting, because the StarNet conversion of the TDS.raw is not perfect. ie/ the measurements are there but significant editing is required to whip it into shape. I have access to some .raw files that came out of SP Survey Pro and Access. I'll have to see how SurvNet likes those.?ÿ

?ÿ


 
Posted : October 28, 2020 4:32 pm