AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Surface Penetrating Radar

8 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
722 Views
john-hamilton
(@john-hamilton)
Posts: 3465
Member P&R, Founder
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I was looking at some models from US Radar, http://www.usradar.com/

Does anyone know the rough cost of one of these systems?


 
Posted : October 5, 2011 12:56 pm
Cliff Mugnier
(@cliff-mugnier)
Posts: 1220
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I think they're now less than $10k. Thirty years ago (middle 1970s) they were well over $100K. Works well when there's little to no clay and/or moisture in the soil.


 
Posted : October 5, 2011 1:05 pm
liz
 liz
(@liz)
Posts: 163
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I priced a system last year made by a company in New Hampshire. The complete package was going to be around $16K.


 
Posted : October 5, 2011 3:42 pm
Farsites
(@farsites)
Posts: 267
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Have not utilized GPR for many years, has it improved much? I remember we had trouble defining utilities below 10', and it took a trained eye to interpret. Someone with the skills an ultrasound tech. Would like to try again.


 
Posted : October 5, 2011 4:13 pm
holy-cow
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25989
Member P&R, Founder
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Our area is nearly all clay soils. Guess we can forget using it here.


 
Posted : October 5, 2011 4:19 pm

RADAR
(@dougie)
Posts: 7880
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

When I lived in NE, I penetrated the clay soils every day.....

with stakes....;-)


 
Posted : October 5, 2011 5:43 pm
Marc Anderson
(@marc-anderson)
Posts: 455
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Works well enough for things you don't want to dig up, like unexploded munitions.

I wouldn't design from it though......

Generally not the highest level of accuracy or precision.


 
Posted : October 5, 2011 9:16 pm
Frank Willis
(@frank-willis)
Posts: 799
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I just finished working on a project where I called in a GPR guy to scan a foundation slab that was allegedly failing. I stood there all day watching him do the work, and when I saw what the GPR was outputting I was disappointed in the complexity involved in reading the information. It was not nearly as clear and intuitive as the advertisements are, and in many cases you can't tell what you are looking at. This is true even for the operator doing my project, and also for the interpreter who prepared the report. It also did not give exact depth to the rebars because it has to be calibrated against something of known depth.

I challenged some of the readings in the report even though the firm is very reputable and has been doing that type of work since GPR was available commercially.

It ain't what the ads make it look like.


 
Posted : October 8, 2011 6:27 am