AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Slope Monitoring

17 Posts
15 Users
0 Reactions
454 Views
jhenry
(@jhenry)
Posts: 112
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Does anybody have a suggestion on what to set for monitoring a slope that is potentially moving. I'm thinking hubs, but concerned with durability. rebars?
thanks


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 9:57 am
jimmy-cleveland
(@jimmy-cleveland)
Posts: 2808
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I would set either hubs or rebars at regular intervals, possibly a grid, and locate them on a regular basis. Once you have your intial location, you can stake them out, and get real-time differences between the original location and the current location.


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 10:05 am
jhenry
(@jhenry)
Posts: 112
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'm not concerned about the procedure, I already have spreadsheets that I've setup on previous montioring jobs to generate my reports. I would just like suggestions on what type of material to set in the ground. The difference here is the previous jobs were for settlement monitoring (vertical only), not for slope monitoring (3D)


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 10:08 am
Jeff Moog
(@jeff-moog)
Posts: 34
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

On a slope monitoring job I was involved with, we set bars & caps, first for durability and second for visibility.


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 10:13 am
a-harris
(@a-harris)
Posts: 8759
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I would think that you should use different items.

Place a concrete block, drive a short rod/stake and drive a longer rod/stake and take readings on any structures.


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 10:14 am

bill93
(@bill93)
Posts: 9977
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Are you thinking of durability over months, years, or decades?
Do you have frost heave to worry about?
What are the chances of someone messing with your points in this area? I.e., do they need to be hidden below the surface so no one "cleans up" and removes hubs?
Would they get driven over if below ground and thus change the elevation?
Will rebars add confusion by being mistaken for property corners?


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 10:20 am
james-fleming
(@james-fleming)
Posts: 5732
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'd avoid hubs like the plague (at least there I work) because I would be afraid of "noise" from freeze/thaw heave corrupting the data.


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 10:20 am
Moe Shetty
(@moe-shetty)
Posts: 1430
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> I'd avoid hubs like the plague (at least there I work) because I would be afraid of "noise" from freeze/thaw heave corrupting the data.

rebar's deformations will catch frost heave as well.

galvanized ground rods could be a good candidate


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 10:22 am
jhenry
(@jhenry)
Posts: 112
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

see my answers below in red

> Are you thinking of durability over months, years, or decades? months
> Do you have frost heave to worry about? yes (Pennsylvania)
> What are the chances of someone messing with your points in this area? I.e., do they need to be hidden below the surface so no one "cleans up" and removes hubs? little chance
> Would they get driven over if below ground and thus change the elevation? its a steep slope, no vehicle would be driving on it
> Will rebars add confusion by being mistaken for property corners? no


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 10:31 am
Georges
(@georges)
Posts: 356
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

A simple and affordable method that appears to work okay:

Medium size rocks (~ 0.3m x0.3m x 0.1m) placed on a grid. Hilti nail drilled into each rock at its highest point. Leveling observation(s) on each nail.


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 10:35 am

Dave Ingram
(@dave-ingram)
Posts: 2140
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I think that a consideration should be the length of the rod (or whatever you use). If you are concerned about shallow surface movement, then you would want short rods. If the concern is deep, then you want longer rods.

Perhaps even some monitoring of the surface and deep. For the deep perhaps dig a hole and set a piece of 12" pipe to serve as a well and then a rod at the bottom. You might be able to get some idea of stability at different depths.


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 10:42 am
fieldguy
(@fieldguy)
Posts: 21
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

How dense a grid are you thinking?
How large is the area?
How do geologists commonly make these measurements?


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 10:44 am
Mark Mayer
(@mark-mayer)
Posts: 3371
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> Does anybody have a suggestion on what to set for monitoring a slope that is potentially moving. I'm thinking hubs, but concerned with durability. rebars?

I think that if you are asking the question you ought to go with the upgrade. Come on, rebar aren't that expensive. Shoot the lock off that wallet.


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 11:14 am
Eugenio Palomo
(@eugenio-palomo)
Posts: 21
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I did this using a Leica HDS-3000 3D laser scanner. It is very easy, fast and accurate. Reports are based on point cloud information and excel spreadsheets. I know, its probably not an affordable solution, buy I thought it might help.


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 11:24 am
jud
 jud
(@jud)
Posts: 1918
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Dave's suggestion is a good one. Need to find out what the requirements and intent of the project is. If just the surface it could only be done with marks that are only effected by that surface, if needing to find what or if anything is moving below the surface it requires monitoring each layer of material. A deep movement will effect all above it and there will be shear forces in any stable layer below that movement, all above that shear plate will need stabilization.
jud


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 11:26 am

Cliff Mugnier
(@cliff-mugnier)
Posts: 1220
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Is the slope comprised of soil, rocks, stone, what? Is there grass/weeds? Do you want only surface movement or are you interested in differential movement of surface vs. certain depths?


 
Posted : September 9, 2011 3:16 pm
Mike Lacey
(@mike-lacey)
Posts: 107
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I've done quite a few monitoring jobs for different reasons. For slope monitoring, rebar genrally works good. You need to talk to the engineer to see what they are looking for, and what their specifications are. Keep the engineer in the loop on what your using and what your methods are.


 
Posted : September 10, 2011 6:16 am