Notifications
Clear all

PLSS question

11 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@dave-lindell)
Posts: 1683
Topic starter
 

What's the highest numbered township and/or range number you know of?

Are there any over one hundred?

(I'm used to working in T3N, R12W)

 
Posted : July 23, 2018 8:02 pm
(@loyal)
Posts: 3735
Registered
 

I live in T15N R120W 6th PM, and there is a fractional Township (121W) West of me.

Not sure off hand what the maximum Township North is in Wyoming, I am in the Southwest Corner.

The largest North Township "number" is probably in North Dakota, which is in the 5th PM (I think).

Loyal

 
Posted : July 23, 2018 8:39 pm
(@gene-kooper)
Posts: 1318
Registered
 

The GLO Records web site has a bulk data download feature that allows one to download relational databases of all the land records in their system.?ÿ The township database shows that there are three townships in Minnesota that are just below the Canadian border with township numbers of T. 168 N.?ÿ Here is a link to the original township plat for T. 168 N., R. 35 W., 5th Mer. Minnesota.

https://glorecords.blm.gov/details/survey/default.aspx?dm_id=236497&sid=amdnq12h.yih&surveyDetailsTabIndex=1

Doing a similar search for the highest range number confirms what Loyal posted.

ETA:?ÿ Loyal may correct about North Dakota.?ÿ However their survey plats are not on the GLO Records web site.?ÿ I found a few ND patents that are supposedly in T. 168 N., R. 81 W.?ÿ When I checked the land status records the highest township number is T. 164 N. and it is a fractional township closing on the border.

?ÿ

 
Posted : July 23, 2018 9:48 pm
(@jkinak)
Posts: 378
Registered
 

84S 266W Seward Meridian AK

S84S266W
 
Posted : July 23, 2018 9:49 pm
(@allen-wrench)
Posts: 307
Registered
 

@gene-kooper In ND the State Water Commission is the record keeper for GLO plats... for whatever reason.?ÿ

 
Posted : July 24, 2018 4:19 am
(@rick-taylor)
Posts: 114
Registered
 

NW corner of North Dakota is T164N, R103W. SW corner is T129N, R107W. Both fractional townships.

 
Posted : July 24, 2018 5:47 am
(@allen-wrench)
Posts: 307
Registered
 

The NW angle of MN has that beat - just barely.?ÿ 168-35.

 
Posted : July 24, 2018 8:27 am
(@andy-nold)
Posts: 2016
 

In the Texas & Pacific Railway Company Survey, ranges are known as blocks. Block 82 is the equivalent to R82W and is located just north of El Paso. As for Townships, the biggest township number is T10S.

T10S was cut in half because Jacob Kuechler, the guy who laid out the survey, had 4 miles excess distance measurement in 80 miles.

The T&P blocks are generally 6 miles wide and 8 miles tall (but some were 6 miles wide by 18 miles tall) and they definitely weren't laid out in the traditional PLSS manner.

 
Posted : July 24, 2018 8:31 am
(@dave-lindell)
Posts: 1683
Topic starter
 

Thank you all for your input.

 
Posted : July 24, 2018 8:37 am
(@dougie)
Posts: 7889
Registered
 

had 4 miles excess distance measurement in 80 miles.

So just prorate that out...should work out great

Image result for should work out great gif

 
Posted : July 24, 2018 8:41 am
(@andy-nold)
Posts: 2016
 
Posted by: RADAR

So just prorate that out...should work out great

The working theory is that he was using a yard chain (36") instead of a vara chain (33-1/3"). The state cut the survey off at the 80 mile reservation line and those certificates were applied to the excess inside the railroad reservation.

?ÿ

And to be clear, this issue was just on the surveys west of the Pecos River. East of the Pecos has its own peculiarities.

 
Posted : July 24, 2018 9:39 am