Notifications
Clear all

NATRF and NAPGD

22 Posts
13 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
(@spmpls)
Posts: 656
Registered
Topic starter
 

The NGS released the linked NSRS Modernization News document yesterday where they have officially announced the names of the 2022 reference frames and datums. They also confirmed they will be plate fixed systems:

https://geodesy.noaa.gov/datums/newdatums/NSRSModernizationNewsIssue6.pdf

 
Posted : 24/01/2017 8:37 am
(@bill93)
Posts: 9834
 

Rather clumsy names, but good to see progress in defining them.

 
Posted : 24/01/2017 9:06 am
(@ruffbrew)
Posts: 46
Registered
 

Soon the control datasheets will get even longer :scream:

 
Posted : 24/01/2017 9:28 am
(@mkennedy)
Posts: 683
Customer
 

gschrock, post: 410645, member: 556 wrote: Wonder if we will refer to the first NAPGD realization as "nap-gad 22"?

I prefer "nap-good".

 
Posted : 24/01/2017 10:16 am
(@bill93)
Posts: 9834
 

What was wrong with NAD22 or NAD2022 ?

 
Posted : 24/01/2017 11:30 am
(@andy-nold)
Posts: 2016
 

Wait, isn't NA-TeRF22 the succesor to NAD83 and NAPGD22 successor to NAVD88?

 
Posted : 24/01/2017 12:04 pm
(@spmpls)
Posts: 656
Registered
Topic starter
 

Yes, that is correct - NATRF for NAD83 and NAPGD for NAVD88.

 
Posted : 24/01/2017 12:24 pm
(@mccracker)
Posts: 340
Registered
 

Now when your client asks you why your coords differ from the other guy, you can give them the latest and greatest acronym and that'll splain it!

 
Posted : 24/01/2017 6:40 pm
(@geeoddmike)
Posts: 1556
Registered
 

gschrock, post: 410685, member: 556 wrote: My guess is that it will not be based on the NAD83 ellipsoid (and noting that this is more along the lines of ITRF/IGS) they wanted to change naming convention...

ITRF coordinates are translated to LLh using the GRS80 reference ellipsoid as are NAD83. For ITRF see: http://itrf.ign.fr/faq.php?type=answer

I liked SNARF (Stable North American Reference Frame) due to its whimsical name.

Given the confusion expressed by many when referring to the multiplicity of NAD83 versions, a completely different name may eliminate confusion.

Cheers,

DMM

 
Posted : 24/01/2017 6:56 pm
(@bill93)
Posts: 9834
 

GeeOddMike, post: 410725, member: 677 wrote: ITRF coordinates are translated to LLh using the GRS80 reference ellipsoid as are NAD83.

The dimensions are the same, but isn't the origin about a meter different as well as a rotation?

 
Posted : 24/01/2017 8:10 pm
(@geeoddmike)
Posts: 1556
Registered
 

As can be see above, the reference ellipsoid does NOT include reference to where the origin is located. You are correct that the origin of NAD83 and ITRF differ at the ~2 meter level. IGN page linked in the earlier post should be explored for more details.

 
Posted : 24/01/2017 8:27 pm
(@jim-frame)
Posts: 7277
 

I've never seen "eccentricity" spelled "excentricity" before, but apparently it's a legit if archaic spelling.

 
Posted : 24/01/2017 8:48 pm
(@brad-ott)
Posts: 6185
Registered
 

GeeOddMike, post: 410725, member: 677 wrote: a completely different name may eliminate confusion

sure, maybe.

 
Posted : 25/01/2017 6:31 am
(@mark-silver)
Posts: 713
Registered
 

I vote that we make the EPOCH date Carl Friedrich Gauss's 245th birthday: 30 April 2022.

Because I think he was a cool guy and that should be enough to outweigh anybody else's stupid suggestions.

1 January 2020 (which is what I expect them to use) is just too boring and predictable. We need to honor math and geodesy heroes more prominently.

 
Posted : 25/01/2017 8:02 am
(@shawn-billings)
Posts: 2689
Registered
 

I'd have probably gone with NAD22 and NAVD22, but that's just me.

There was a difference in the ellipsoid from NAD27 and NAD83. Doesn't seem to be a good reason to upend 90 years of convention.

 
Posted : 25/01/2017 8:23 am
(@bill93)
Posts: 9834
 

gschrock, post: 410778, member: 556 wrote: not longer need to do that transformation...

They said plate-fixed. There will be a short time when the transformation isn't significant, but at a couple cm per year NA plate velocity, we will soon need at least a simple translation. Maybe sooner for the Pacific guys?

Will OPUS then give all three sets, IGS, NAD83, and NATRF numbers to aid the transition?

 
Posted : 25/01/2017 8:32 am
(@geeoddmike)
Posts: 1556
Registered
 

However we might want to celebrate the heroes of geodesy, I sure don't want to add to the equations above additional programming complexity of dates other than 1 January. While ITRF96 has been superseded the values above give a sense of the magnitudes of the differences with mas meaning milli-arcseconds.

Cheers,

DMM

 
Posted : 25/01/2017 8:55 am
(@mark-silver)
Posts: 713
Registered
 

News Flash!
From the Huffington Post:

[INDENT]‰ÛÏNGS Officials told they are not allowed to publicly talk about Plate Shift. America is the center of the earth and as such all coordinates will be fixed with respect to the Capital Dome in Washington. All references to new reference frames is being removed from NGS websites and employees told to not to discuss modernization plans. By presidential decree NAD83 and WGS84 are defined to be identical and there is no need for further coordinate enhancements."[/INDENT]

 
Posted : 25/01/2017 9:19 am
 jaro
(@jaro)
Posts: 1721
Registered
 

Thanks GSCHROCK for the graphic. It answers the question I had in this thread:
https://surveyorconnect.com/community/threads/difference-between-nad83-and-wgs84-projected-out.329243/

 
Posted : 25/01/2017 9:48 am
(@spmpls)
Posts: 656
Registered
Topic starter
 

There are also some nice graphics available in the Power Point presentation made by Dru Smith at the fall AGU meeting posted here. Third from the top:

https://geodesy.noaa.gov/web/science_edu/presentations_library/

 
Posted : 25/01/2017 10:09 am
Page 1 / 2