AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Google Earth, DEM's and elevations

12 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
574 Views
MightyMoe
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 10534
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

We have two recent jobs that need elevation information and began by looking at Google elevations for planning, which I'm told is generated by the public available DEM's. I was also informed these were generated by using quad sheet info. One of the projects was an elevation cert in a Zone A which needs a BFE. For that one the Google elevations ended up being 5 feet low for the house, which was a nice surprise, and Google had the river quite a bit west of where it is, although it may have moved since the DEM's were generated.

The other one was a Dam project, we just did some preliminary cross sections and they were flatter than the dam and this time over 5' off vertically.

Is it true that the DEM info is what Google uses for elevations and is that data taken from quad sheets?

The elevation cert is located on a 20' contour quad and the Dam is located on a 40' contour quad.


 
Posted : January 13, 2017 8:46 am
Jim in AZ
(@jim-in-az)
Posts: 3374
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

It is my understanding that Google will not reveal the source of the vertical datum it utilizes. It is my personal experience that it can vary tremendously from ALL survey determined values. I belive there has been discussion on this forum of people finding it to bee hundreds of feet off. Google itself states that displayed elevations are a "general reference tool."

It doesn't matter what Google Earth shows, ALL FEMA related data must be determined from the FIRM's, regardless of reality...


 
Posted : January 13, 2017 8:55 am
WA-ID Surveyor
(@wa-id-surveyor)
Posts: 982
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I wouldn't use Google Earth elevations for anything more than a general reference. I have seen them be fairly accurate from a general elevation standpoint 2'+/- and have also seen them several hundred feet off. Use each tool, office or field, in accordance with it's intended use.


 
Posted : January 13, 2017 9:05 am
MightyMoe
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 10534
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I don't use Google for anything beyond making some pictures, some very preliminary plots, and using them for rough acreages. It's nice for planning.

The engineer will no doubt use it to plan where the cross sections will need to be for determining the BFE but that's about it. I've never got any good data from DEM's or Google.
I was just curious if they are using DEM data or if like the photos they might include some large mapping data they can get their hands on in the area.


 
Posted : January 13, 2017 9:23 am
makerofmaps
(@makerofmaps)
Posts: 560
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

A good source for lidar data is https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/?basemap=b1&category=ned,nedsrc&title=3DEP%20View or
https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/


 
Posted : January 13, 2017 9:30 am

MightyMoe
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 10534
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

makerofmaps, post: 408900, member: 9079 wrote: A good source for lidar data is https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/?basemap=b1&category=ned,nedsrc&title=3DEP%20View&apos ;"> https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/?basemap=b1&category=ned,nedsrc&title=3DEP View or
https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/

If I'm reading that correctly, I'm in the "blank" area for all of that data


 
Posted : January 13, 2017 10:14 am
Jim in AZ
(@jim-in-az)
Posts: 3374
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

MightyMoe, post: 408905, member: 700 wrote: If I'm reading that correctly, I'm in the "blank" area for all of that data

Same here - no coasts in AZ...


 
Posted : January 13, 2017 12:24 pm
imaudigger
(@imaudigger)
Posts: 2957
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I have found that they sometimes utilize information that is not the same as the USGS DEM. Not sure where they get the data. It's a mosaic from many sources for sure.


 
Posted : January 13, 2017 4:33 pm
MightyMoe
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 10534
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Seems that there is a lot of data being used with mysterious origins.


 
Posted : January 13, 2017 7:21 pm
Rich.
(@rich)
Posts: 779
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I only use GE for scouting jobs before quoting.

I used to use it for elevations by getting a rough elevation in the center of an intersection and use that to base my topo from ONLY IF the subject WAS NOT in or near a flood zone. Instead of using an assumed number I would use something close based on GE but clearly the survey would state this. I no longer do this because with GPS it is too easy to put things into NAVD.

Around my area GE is very good though with elevations. Very close. Link someone above said, usually +/- a foot or two depending on how flat/open things are.


 
Posted : January 13, 2017 9:04 pm

gisjoel
(@gisjoel)
Posts: 250
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Have you tried the SRTM Dataset. It's been revised and voids filled. We're too far north for it. If I was google SRTM would be the most consistent for worldwide consumers. http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/ .

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


 
Posted : January 14, 2017 7:32 pm
roger_LS
(@roger_ls)
Posts: 445
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I am amazed at how good google earth's elevations are. I've got in the habit of using it for just a very rough check that a Navd88 elevation has been established properly on site, just hover the mouse over an area on a street or hardscape and compare, they're usually right on


 
Posted : January 15, 2017 1:13 pm