Reading RPLS is free for the whole profession. Members post, reply, and get the members-only rooms.
Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Short static session on Tuesday mid-day May 4.?ÿ Not a very clear sky above receiver, but I would think good enough for a solution.?ÿ In the past, I have had to wait typically up to 24 hours to get a solution from OPUS, but its now been nearly 3 days, and I don't think I've ever encountered the message below (email response from OPUS).
I processed this same file with Canadian SRS-PPP, and it seems to process fine.
FILE: CLIENT.21o OP1620388446631
?ÿ
?ÿ1008?ÿ?ÿ NOTE: You provided a zero or negative antenna height.
?ÿ1008?ÿ?ÿ If ARP HGT = 0.0, OPUS solves for the position of your selected antenna's reference point (ARP).
?ÿ1008?ÿ?ÿ If ARP HGT < 0.0, OPUS solves for a location inside or above the antenna
?ÿ1008
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ RSGPS OUTPUT
?ÿ
?ÿVERSION= rsgps version 1.38 2017 05 26
?ÿRun Date and Time = 2021?ÿ 5?ÿ 7?ÿ 7 55 47
?ÿ
?ÿProject Directory = /var/tmp/opus_local/RS71/21124/
?ÿ
?ÿSolution Mode = network
?ÿ
?ÿ W-Ratio test indicates SUCCESS!
?ÿObservations Used/Available=?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ 9264?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ 11544
?ÿ
?ÿNetwork Quality Indicator=?ÿ?ÿ 28.08
?ÿRMS=?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ 0.375
Posted : May 7, 2021 6:09 am
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
I once tried a zero height and OPUS got mad, so used 0.0001 meter and it was happy.
Posted : May 7, 2021 6:37 am
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
What am I missing with the Canadian site??ÿ My results are a bunch of individual lat/lons that when plotted vary quite a bit.?ÿ I don't get one single solution like OPUS.?ÿ But OPUS isn't giving me much lately.?ÿ Thanks.
Posted : May 7, 2021 6:37 am
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
CSRS-PPP will process as either kinematic (solving for every epoch) or static (one solution). Maybe you had the kinematic button selected??ÿ
?ÿ
As for zero height, OPUS always has worked for me when using 0.000 as the height.?ÿ
?ÿ
Anyone having trouble with an online processor should also try Trimble Centerpoint RTX PPP (trimblertx.com). It will take rinex data (and trimble native formats) from any receiver as long as the antenna is in their list. One caveat...the returned NAD83 (2011) epoch 2010.0 may not be the best, they have started using HTDP for their real time product, but I am not sure about the post processed. I always run the ITRF14 position through HTDP (NGS utility) to get NAD83 (2011) epoch 2010.0. This is more of an issue as you go west across the US.?ÿ
Posted : May 7, 2021 6:46 am
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
RTX-PP is still using the Morvel56 model as of last week:
As much as I like RTX results, it has caused some serious confusion amongst surveyors in our firm, and caused quite a few to dismiss it altogether in favor of OPUS.
Posted : May 7, 2021 7:30 am
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
You may be confusing OPUS-RS with your data.
First off, Comment Line 12 says you Are providing 7 observables; L1?ÿ C1?ÿ D1?ÿ L2?ÿ P2?ÿ D2?ÿ C2
But the C2 data provided is 0.000
Second; you are including Glonass data.
Make life easier for OPS-RS which only uses L1?ÿ C1/P1?ÿ L2?ÿ C2/P2 data.
Use teqc and filter out for L1?ÿ C1?ÿ L2?ÿ P2 data only, which also removes the Glonass and then resubmit.
Years ago I always had to filter my OPUS-Rs down to the 4 observables, but then it got better over the years figuring it out. That C2 = 0.00 may be the stymie.
Paul in PA
Posted : May 7, 2021 7:39 am
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Thanks, I'll look into that.?ÿ I'm only a little familiar with teqc, and don't know the commands.?ÿ Do you happen to know the command for filtering as you describe?
Posted : May 7, 2021 8:04 am
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Posted : May 7, 2021 8:07 am
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Posted : May 7, 2021 8:08 am
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
subscribing
Posted : May 7, 2021 8:08 am
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
I am not at all familiar with the teqc commands, I use WINteqc, which guides you through it. I ran WINteqc, chose your file, selected GPS only and then selected choose observations, selecting CA L1 L2 P2, it gave me a bunch of error comments but did the job anyway. I sent your edited file to OPUS-RS using 1m antenna height and following is your solution:
?ÿ
FILE: LEWIN.21o.teqc OP1620399618929
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿNGS OPUS-RS SOLUTION REPORT
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ========================
All computed coordinate accuracies are listed as 1-sigma RMS values.
For additional information: https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/OPUS/about.jsp#accuracy
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿUSER: [email protected] ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿDATE: May 07, 2021
RINEX FILE: lewi124p.21o ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿTIME: 15:02:15 UTC
?ÿ?ÿSOFTWARE: rsgps ?ÿ1.38 RS52.prl 1.99.3 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿSTART: 2021/05/04 15:28:30
?ÿEPHEMERIS: igr21562.eph [rapid] ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿSTOP: 2021/05/04 17:06:30
?ÿ?ÿNAV FILE: brdc1240.21n ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿOBS USED: ?ÿ1869 / ?ÿ6440 ?ÿ?ÿ: ?ÿ29%
?ÿ?ÿANT NAME: HEMS631 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿNONE ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿQUALITY IND. ?ÿ27.54/ 29.44
ARP HEIGHT: 1.000 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿNORMALIZED RMS: ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ0.450
?ÿREF FRAME: NAD_83(2011)(EPOCH:2010.0000) ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿITRF2014 (EPOCH:2021.33885)
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿX: ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ1364904.965(m) ?ÿ?ÿ0.017(m) ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ1364904.014(m) ?ÿ?ÿ0.017(m)
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿY: ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ-4535799.061(m) ?ÿ?ÿ0.016(m) ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ-4535797.647(m) ?ÿ?ÿ0.016(m)
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿZ: ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ4257437.602(m) ?ÿ?ÿ0.022(m) ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ4257437.593(m) ?ÿ?ÿ0.022(m)
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿLAT: ?ÿ?ÿ42 ?ÿ8 28.10008 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ0.015(m) ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ42 ?ÿ8 28.13525 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ0.015(m)
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿE LON: ?ÿ286 44 51.00961 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ0.017(m) ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ286 44 50.98769 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ0.017(m)
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿW LON: ?ÿ?ÿ73 15 ?ÿ8.99039 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ0.017(m) ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ73 15 ?ÿ9.01231 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ0.017(m)
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿEL HGT: ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ292.790(m) ?ÿ?ÿ0.022(m) ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ291.576(m) ?ÿ?ÿ0.022(m)
?ÿORTHO HGT: ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ322.344(m) ?ÿ?ÿ0.030(m) [NAVD88 (Computed using GEOID18)]
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿUTM COORDINATES ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿSTATE PLANE COORDINATES
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿUTM (Zone 18) ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿSPC (2001 MA M)
Northing (Y) [meters] ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ4666924.717 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ878233.922
Easting (X) ?ÿ[meters] ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ644406.039 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ55140.804
Convergence ?ÿ[degrees] ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ1.17270556 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ-1.17720278
Point Scale ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ0.99985659 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ0.99996509
Combined Factor ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ0.99981068 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ0.99991917
US NATIONAL GRID DESIGNATOR: 18TXM4440666924(NAD 83)
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿBASE STATIONS USED
PID ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿDESIGNATION ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿLATITUDE ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿLONGITUDE DISTANCE(m)
DH5829 CTEG EAST GRANBY CORS ARP ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿN415524.347 W0724155.880 ?ÿ?ÿ51834.6
DI0622 NYST SARATOGA CORS ARP ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿN430341.735 W0734815.010 ?ÿ111824.7
DP1320 MABN BERNARDSTON CORS ARP ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿN424011.991 W0723228.643 ?ÿ?ÿ82941.5
DP1959 MASB STURBRIDGE CORS ARP ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿN420641.081 W0720513.985 ?ÿ?ÿ96411.6
DH5825 CTBR BROOKFIELD CORS ARP ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿN412949.864 W0732505.673 ?ÿ?ÿ72839.4
DK7175 NYCS COBLESKILL CORS ARP ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿN424002.836 W0742910.947 ?ÿ117202.8
DJ8953 VTD2 DUMMERSTON CORS ARP ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿN425506.108 W0723206.441 ?ÿ104537.9
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿNEAREST NGS PUBLISHED CONTROL POINT
MZ2031 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿENOE ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿN421057.415 W0731355.949 ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ4902.7
This position and the above vector components were computed without any
knowledge by the National Geodetic Survey regarding the equipment or
field operating procedures used.
It only used 29% of the observations, but based on your estimate of site conditions I could use that position. Your file is long enough to break up into 4 smaller files and see if 3 out of 4 give a much smaller error.
?ÿ
WOW, CORS from 4 states.
?ÿ
Paul in PA
Posted : May 7, 2021 9:08 am
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Posted : May 7, 2021 9:11 am
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Paul,
I tried WinTeqc but I couldn't get it to work.?ÿ It wouldn't write the output file.?ÿ I've contacted the maker to see if he can provide help.
Al
Posted : May 7, 2021 6:39 pm