Notifications
Clear all

A quarter section corner...

23 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
259 Views
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 12001
Member
Topic starter
 

Paxton was the County Surveyor. Walker was one of my predecessors here at CDF (his work is very accurate). Hanby (a private surveyor) set a 1" iron pipe (bottom of the page) by single proportion which apparently spawned a law suit between west and east owners because the original quarter section corner (top of page) was found by Paxton. Paxton's corner prevailed in the litigation.


Paint went kind of haywire. This is an excerpt of Walker's map. Note this is before the Final Order of Condemnation into CDF so the north-south heavy line is not correct. The final description calls for the north-south centerline which is about 16' west of Edmond's southwest corner. Edmond's Deed does not call for the centerline leaving our common predecessor, Whitlow, with a strip between Edmond's west boundary and the north-south centerline. It is a strange situation:


This is the original quarter section corner Paxton found:


The brass topper set in 1970 in place of the 4x4 post and 3/4" iron pipe that Walker found in 1958. It looks like it is set in a 1-1/2" iron pipe. LS2780 shows it as found on a 1976 Survey for a nearby reservoir.


 
Posted : March 7, 2017 9:43 am
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 12001
Member
Topic starter
 

This is better. North is up.

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 9:51 am
FL/GA PLS
(@flga-pls)
Posts: 7403
Member
 

What a great post! All newbies and oldies should read this. 🙂

Edit: and everyone in between.

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 10:15 am
(@warren-ward-pls-co-ok)
Posts: 196
Member
 

Excellent example - should be an NCEES exam question.

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 10:39 am
paden-cash
(@paden-cash)
Posts: 11088
Supporter
 

FL/GA PLS., post: 417298, member: 379 wrote: What a great post! All newbies and oldies should read this. 🙂

Edit: and everyone in between.

I'm sorry...maybe I'm just old...but someone usually has to pay me to wade through things like that!

(seriously it is very interesting)

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 11:05 am

FL/GA PLS
(@flga-pls)
Posts: 7403
Member
 

paden cash, post: 417318, member: 20 wrote: I'm sorry...maybe I'm just old

Hell, I'm older than you. The article Dave posted grabbed my attention and I had to go through the whole thing. It also illustrated other surveyors can look but can not "see". An ability that only seems to come with experience, or from a damn good mentor.

All of us have F'd up at least once. 😉

Have a good 'un and oil the cellar doors and if Toto don't make it, just throw 'em on the grill. :p

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 11:25 am
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 12001
Member
Topic starter
 

Hanby should be Hamby per a look up of LS2843 on the BPELSG website but Walker misspelled his name thoughout the notes 🙂

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 1:34 pm
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 12001
Member
Topic starter
 

The 3/4" iron pipe south of the distance 164.16' (south of Reservoir Take Line) is lying on the ground out there near a fairly fresh power pole. I staked out where it should be (in among the Manzanita) and it looks like the power company scraped about a 20' diameter circle around before they drilled for the pole. There is a lot of lava cap in that particular spot so they probably needed a pretty serious drill rig. I have all the other pipes excepts the 1/16 corner by Hanby (it may be under a house), the dot on the right (which per the notes is a 1" iron pipe up 2.5' and was a lease corner). The 3/4" iron pipe on the take line is bent but we were able to find the "gazinta" and the 2" iron pipe is intact. The water was right up to its top, I had to get some logs to make a sort of platform so I didn't get my feet too wet. Walker did a traverse from the 1-1/4" iron pipe P.O.B. east to the pipe east of the take line then northwest through the 3/4 and 2" iron pipes then over to a stake by the 3/4" (now on the ground) then down to close. So I'm going to see how that fits with my control in the area, maybe get a better fix on where the 3/4" iron pipe was located. I have more reservoir monuments running northwest, he apparently just used a record angle to get the intersection at the north point. Maybe no one cared too much because of the lava cap (no timber) because they didn't set a monument at that point.


The 2" iron pipe is down in a swale. Walker said the swale was running, we found the swale with running water and the lake backed up to the top of the pipe:

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 1:47 pm
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 12001
Member
Topic starter
 

FL/GA PLS., post: 417324, member: 379 wrote: Hell, I'm older than you. The article Dave posted grabbed my attention and I had to go through the whole thing. It also illustrated other surveyors can look but can not "see". An ability that only seems to come with experience, or from a damn good mentor.

All of us have F'd up at least once. 😉

Have a good 'un and oil the cellar doors and if Toto don't make it, just throw 'em on the grill. :p

The pipes that Walker says are at the corners of Edmond's property aren't called for in his 1953 description. They fit distance very well, within a few tenths of record.

I'm not sure whether I should accept them or not?

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 2:01 pm
(@dave-vliem)
Posts: 35
Member
 

Not a record monument!!! Blasphemy! Throw 'em the hell out and set yer own!!! Who gives a ratz azz if the owners have been relying on them for half a century...

/sarc/

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 2:09 pm

paden-cash
(@paden-cash)
Posts: 11088
Supporter
 

Is that 2" pipe measured as I.D. or O.D. ?

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 2:17 pm
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 12001
Member
Topic starter
 

paden cash, post: 417368, member: 20 wrote: Is that 2" pipe measured as I.D. or O.D. ?

Ha ha...

Nominal Inside Diameter.

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 2:30 pm
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 12001
Member
Topic starter
 

Attached are the relevant pages from Walker's field notes as to where the 3/4" iron pipe found lying down on the job was located.

Attached files

Walker pages.pdf (1.1 MB) 

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 2:31 pm
brad-ott
(@brad-ott)
Posts: 6184
Supporter
 

Dave Karoly, post: 417361, member: 94 wrote: The 3/4" iron pipe south of the distance 164.16' (south of Reservoir Take Line) is lying on the ground out there near a fairly fresh power pole. I staked out where it should be (in among the Manzanita) and it looks like the power company scraped about a 20' diameter circle around before they drilled for the pole. There is a lot of lava cap in that particular spot so they probably needed a pretty serious drill rig. I have all the other pipes excepts the 1/16 corner by Hanby (it may be under a house), the dot on the right (which per the notes is a 1" iron pipe up 2.5' and was a lease corner). The 3/4" iron pipe on the take line is bent but we were able to find the "gazinta" and the 2" iron pipe is intact. The water was right up to its top, I had to get some logs to make a sort of platform so I didn't get my feet too wet. Walker did a traverse from the 1-1/4" iron pipe P.O.B. east to the pipe east of the take line then northwest through the 3/4 and 2" iron pipes then over to a stake by the 3/4" (now on the ground) then down to close. So I'm going to see how that fits with my control in the area, maybe get a better fix on where the 3/4" iron pipe was located. I have more reservoir monuments running northwest, he apparently just used a record angle to get the intersection at the north point. Maybe no one cared too much because of the lava cap (no timber) because they didn't set a monument at that point.


The 2" iron pipe is down in a swale. Walker said the swale was running, we found the swale with running water and the lake backed up to the top of the pipe:

Those are some sexy images.

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 3:57 pm
(@imaudigger)
Posts: 2958
Member
 

Notice they didn;t have to specify I.D. or O.D.
Everybody back then knew how your suppose to measure a found pipe monument.

Some temporary summer help kid might have measured the outside diameter...but the crew chief probably knew better than take his word on it.

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 4:04 pm

(@jp7191)
Posts: 808
Member
 

Dave Karoly, post: 417373, member: 94 wrote: Attached are the relevant pages from Walker's field notes as to where the 3/4" iron pipe found lying down on the job was located.

Why do you think they were slope chaining on such flat ground? Jp

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 4:17 pm
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 12001
Member
Topic starter
 

Jp7191, post: 417390, member: 1617 wrote: Why do you think they were slope chaining on such flat ground? Jp

I couldn't say.

Why did Walker set Traverse Point #16 only 0.16' from the 3/4" iron pipe (that got knocked out)?

The Butte Unit Forester has his office at this facility; a pretty nice place to have an office. I wouldn't mind being stationed there.

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 4:44 pm
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 12001
Member
Topic starter
 

This is Walker's traverse from the 1-1/4" I.P. P.O.B. east past Hanby's 1/16 corner to black dot at the fence corner then northwest through the 3/4" I.P. and the 2" I.P. to the 3/4" I.P. (knocked out) then south to the P.O.B.
I have it minimally constrained at my coordinate for the P.O.B. and the bearing south to Edmond's S.E. Cor:
[PRE]
MicroSurvey STAR*NET-PRO Version 6.0.43
Copyright 1988-2011 MicroSurvey Software Inc.
Run Date: Tue Mar 07 2017 15:12:02

Summary of Files Used and Option Settings
=========================================

Project Folder and Data Files

Project Name MAGALIA-WALKER TRAVERSE BOQ AREA
Project Folder F:DATA...STARNETWALKER-MINIMALLY CONSTRAINED AT 85
Data File List 1. Magalia-Walker traverse BOQ area.dat

Project Option Settings

STAR*NET Run Mode : Adjust with Error Propagation
Type of Adjustment : 2D
Project Units : FeetUS; DMS
Coordinate System : LOCAL
Default Project Elevation : 0.0000 FeetUS
Apply Average Scale Factor : 1.0000000000
Input/Output Coordinate Order : North-East
Angle Data Station Order : At-From-To
Distance/Vertical Data Type : Slope/Zenith
Convergence Limit; Max Iterations : 0.010000; 10
Default Coefficient of Refraction : 0.070000
Earth Radius : 6372000.00 Meters
Create Coordinate File : Yes
Create Ground Scale Coordinate File : No
Create Dump File : No

Instrument Standard Error Settings

Project Default Instrument
Distances (Constant) : 0.030000 FeetUS
Distances (PPM) : 0.000000
Angles : 15.000000 Seconds
Directions : 15.000000 Seconds
Azimuths & Bearings : 15.000000 Seconds
Centering Error Instrument : 0.005000 FeetUS
Centering Error Target : 0.005000 FeetUS

Summary of Unadjusted Input Observations
========================================

Number of Entered Stations (FeetUS) = 4

Fixed Stations N E Description
85 11402.5565 15284.0997 fndip

Free Stations N E Description
67 11507.5966 15835.2806 fndip
73 11674.1296 15526.2826 fndip
87 11234.9551 15280.4098 fndip

Number of Angle Observations (DMS) = 17

At From To Angle StdErr
85 4517 87 90-27-45.00 18.66
85 4515 4517 90-01-15.00 17.94
4517 85 4518 177-55-15.00 19.96
4518 4517 4519 183-21-45.00 18.96
4519 4518 67 38-47-00.00 16.91
67 4519 4520 167-19-00.00 19.92
4520 67 4521 181-18-15.00 26.80
4521 4520 73 177-33-00.00 40.39
73 4521 4522 141-39-00.00 35.98
4522 73 4516 239-56-15.00 22.50
4516 4522 4515 42-13-00.00 17.20
4515 4516 85 179-56-15.00 19.63
4516 4515 4530 75-00-00.00 9114.74
85 4517 4531 0-00-00.00 FIXED
4517 85 4531 0-00-00.00 FIXED
4518 4517 4532 48-52-00.00 37.90
4518 4517 4533 330-43-30.00 125.10

Number of Distance Observations (FeetUS) = 17

From To Distance StdErr
85 87 167.6500 0.0308
85 4517 212.9500 0.0308
4517 4518 175.0400 0.0308
4518 4519 296.7700 0.0308
4519 67 175.8300 0.0308
67 4520 211.8100 0.0308
4520 4521 81.2300 0.0308
4521 73 58.0800 0.0308
73 4522 110.0500 0.0308
4522 4516 194.9400 0.0308
4516 4515 190.1000 0.0308
4515 85 206.3200 0.0308
4516 4530 0.1600 0.0308
85 4531 200.4800 0.1000
4517 4531 12.4700 0.1000
4518 4532 39.8000 0.0308
4518 4533 11.4300 0.0308

Number of Azimuth/Bearing Observations (DMS) = 2

From To Bearing StdErr
87 85 N01-09-35.00E FREE
87 85 N01-15-40.00E FIXED

[/PRE]

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 5:22 pm
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 12001
Member
Topic starter
 

Continued:
[PRE]
Adjustment Statistical Summary
==============================

Iterations = 3

Number of Stations = 16

Number of Observations = 35
Number of Unknowns = 30
Number of Redundant Obs = 5

Observation Count Sum Squares Error
of StdRes Factor
Angles 17 0.300 0.351
Distances 17 0.410 0.411
Az/Bearings 1 0.000 0.000

Total 35 0.710 0.377

Warning: The Chi-Square Test at 5.00% Level Exceeded Lower Bound
Lower/Upper Bounds (0.408/1.602)

Adjusted Station Information
============================

Coordinate Changes from Entered Provisionals (FeetUS)

Station dN dE
67 0.1748 0.3366
73 0.0802 0.1843
85 -0.0000 -0.0000
87 -0.0081 0.0001

Adjusted Coordinates (FeetUS)

Station N E Description
67 11507.7714 15835.6172 fndip
73 11674.2098 15526.4670 fndip
85 11402.5565 15284.0997 fndip
87 11234.9471 15280.4099 fndip
4517 11399.5884 15497.0266 Setstake
4515 11608.8489 15286.9047 Setstake
4518 11403.5017 15672.0207 SetPK
4519 11392.7217 15968.5922 fndip
4520 11607.8138 15648.9154 T1_SetPK
4521 11647.8032 15578.2035 T2_SetRH
4522 11652.6270 15418.5535 T3_Setstake
4516 11798.9199 15289.7005 Setstake
4530 11798.8807 15289.5454 fndip
4531 11399.7622 15484.5590 fndstlpin
4532 11432.8855 15645.1761 fndip
4533 11397.6909 15662.1780 fndip

Adjusted Observations and Residuals
===================================

Adjusted Angle Observations (DMS)

At From To Angle Residual StdErr StdRes
85 4517 87 90-27-45.00 0-00-00.00 18.66 0.0
85 4515 4517 90-01-10.52 -0-00-04.48 17.94 0.2
4517 85 4518 177-55-13.13 -0-00-01.87 19.96 0.1
4518 4517 4519 183-21-46.06 0-00-01.06 18.96 0.1
4519 4518 67 38-47-04.49 0-00-04.49 16.91 0.3
67 4519 4520 167-19-04.48 0-00-04.48 19.92 0.2
4520 67 4521 181-18-18.15 0-00-03.15 26.80 0.1
4521 4520 73 177-33-02.92 0-00-02.92 40.39 0.1
73 4521 4522 141-38-59.82 -0-00-00.18 35.98 0.0
4522 73 4516 239-56-12.43 -0-00-02.57 22.50 0.1
4516 4522 4515 42-12-57.36 -0-00-02.64 17.20 0.2
4515 4516 85 179-56-10.64 -0-00-04.36 19.63 0.2
4516 4515 4530 75-00-00.00 -0-00-00.00 9114.74 0.0
85 4517 4531 -0-00-00.00 -0-00-00.00 FIXED 0.0
4517 85 4531 0-00-00.00 0-00-00.00 FIXED 0.0
4518 4517 4532 48-52-00.00 -0-00-00.00 37.90 0.0
4518 4517 4533 330-43-30.00 -0-00-00.00 125.10 0.0

Adjusted Distance Observations (FeetUS)

From To Distance Residual StdErr StdRes
85 87 167.6500 -0.0000 0.0308 0.0
85 4517 212.9476 -0.0024 0.0308 0.1
4517 4518 175.0378 -0.0022 0.0308 0.1
4518 4519 296.7673 -0.0027 0.0308 0.1
4519 67 175.8373 0.0073 0.0308 0.2
67 4520 211.8161 0.0061 0.0308 0.2
4520 4521 81.2362 0.0062 0.0308 0.2
4521 73 58.0860 0.0060 0.0308 0.2
73 4522 110.0506 0.0006 0.0308 0.0
4522 4516 194.9479 0.0079 0.0308 0.3
4516 4515 190.0915 -0.0085 0.0308 0.3
4515 85 206.3115 -0.0085 0.0308 0.3
4516 4530 0.1600 0.0000 0.0308 0.0
85 4531 200.4788 -0.0012 0.1000 0.0
4517 4531 12.4688 -0.0012 0.1000 0.0
4518 4532 39.8000 -0.0000 0.0308 0.0
4518 4533 11.4300 0.0000 0.0308 0.0

[/PRE]

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 5:23 pm
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 12001
Member
Topic starter
 

Continued:
[PRE]
Adjusted Azimuth/Bearing Observations (DMS)

From To Bearing Residual StdErr StdRes
87 85 N01-15-40.00E 0-06-05.00 FREE 0.0
87 85 N01-15-40.00E 0-00-00.00 FIXED 0.0

Adjusted Bearings (DMS) and Horizontal Distances (FeetUS)
=========================================================
(Relative Confidence of Bearing is in Seconds)

From To Bearing Distance 95% RelConfidence
Brg Dist PPM
85 87 S01-15-40.00W 167.6500 0.00 0.0754 450.0127
4515 85 S00-46-44.48W 206.3115 61.17 0.0705 341.8496
4515 4516 N00-50-33.84E 190.0915 72.11 0.0705 371.0123
4516 4522 S41-22-23.53E 194.9479 76.54 0.0714 366.1250
4516 4530 S75-50-33.84W 0.1600 22310.69 0.0754 471528.9004
4517 85 N89-12-05.00W 212.9476 45.67 0.0698 327.6730
4517 4518 N88-43-08.13E 175.0378 65.03 0.0712 406.6445
4517 4531 N89-12-05.00W 12.4688 45.67 0.1766 14160.3657
4518 4519 S87-55-05.81E 296.7673 75.76 0.0712 240.0595
4518 4532 N42-24-51.87W 39.8000 113.30 0.0754 1895.5936
4518 4533 S59-26-38.13W 11.4300 313.04 0.0754 6600.5795
4519 67 N49-08-01.33W 175.8373 78.72 0.0715 406.4126
4520 67 S61-48-56.85E 211.8161 80.50 0.0715 337.6100
4520 4521 N60-30-38.70W 81.2362 87.79 0.0715 880.2956
4521 73 N62-57-35.78W 58.0860 93.41 0.0715 1231.0989
4522 73 N78-41-24.05E 110.0506 83.20 0.0710 644.8563
4531 85 N89-12-05.00W 200.4788 45.67 0.1766 880.7071

Traverse Closures of Unadjusted Observations
============================================
(Beginning and Ending on Adjusted Stations)

TRAVERSE 1: fndip
Error Angular = -0.00 Sec, 11 Angles, -0.00 Sec/Angle
Error Linear = 0.0709 S, 0.0303 E
Horiz Precision = 0.0771 Error in 1913.1200, 1:24801, 40.32 PPM

From To Unadj Bearing Unadj Dist
85 4515 N00-46-44.48E BS
85 4517 S89-12-00.52E 212.9500
4517 4518 N88-43-14.48E 175.0400
4518 4519 S87-55-00.52E 296.7700
4519 67 N49-08-00.52W 175.8300
67 4520 N61-49-00.52W 211.8100
4520 4521 N60-30-45.52W 81.2300
4521 73 N62-57-45.52W 58.0800
73 4522 S78-41-14.48W 110.0500
4522 4516 N41-22-30.52W 194.9400
4516 4515 S00-50-29.48W 190.1000
4515 85 S00-46-44.48W 206.3200

Error Propagation
=================

Station Coordinate Standard Deviations (FeetUS)

Station N E
67 0.063323 0.044430
73 0.043391 0.046628
85 0.000000 0.000000
87 0.030815 0.000678
4517 0.019263 0.028505
4515 0.028790 0.025023
4518 0.038599 0.038166
4519 0.078332 0.043859
4520 0.048008 0.047723
4521 0.045627 0.048297
4522 0.039293 0.037221
4516 0.037581 0.049415
4530 0.038942 0.057771
4531 0.018159 0.072126
4532 0.042361 0.043734
4533 0.041002 0.046669

Station Coordinate Error Ellipses (FeetUS)
Confidence Region = 95%

Station Semi-Major Semi-Minor Azimuth of
Axis Axis Major Axis
67 0.160185 0.100959 161-02
73 0.131035 0.084482 129-59
85 0.000000 0.000000 0-00
87 0.075445 0.000002 1-16
4517 0.069777 0.047146 90-48
4515 0.070980 0.060657 13-19
4518 0.096020 0.091837 37-39
4519 0.192703 0.105610 6-52
4520 0.142120 0.085184 135-22
4521 0.138658 0.084989 131-24
4522 0.109505 0.074562 139-15
4516 0.122776 0.089545 75-29
4530 0.144104 0.091195 75-36
4531 0.176563 0.044385 90-48
4532 0.119222 0.089429 131-44
4533 0.121675 0.091198 58-39

Relative Error Ellipses (FeetUS)
Confidence Region = 95%

Stations Semi-Major Semi-Minor Azimuth of
From To Axis Axis Major Axis
85 87 0.075445 0.000002 1-16
4515 85 0.070980 0.060657 13-19
4515 4516 0.073264 0.063429 33-36
4516 4522 0.076040 0.067425 90-23
4516 4530 0.075445 0.017306 75-51
4517 85 0.069777 0.047146 90-48
4517 4518 0.071316 0.055009 83-07
4517 4531 0.176563 0.002761 90-48
4518 4519 0.109295 0.070781 7-39
4518 4532 0.075445 0.021861 137-35
4518 4533 0.075445 0.017347 59-27
4519 67 0.071624 0.066931 141-44
4520 67 0.082929 0.071203 19-12
4520 4521 0.071516 0.034568 120-09
4521 73 0.071511 0.026300 116-38
4522 73 0.071116 0.044151 83-26
4531 85 0.176563 0.044385 90-48

Elapsed Time = 00:00:00

[/PRE]

 
Posted : March 7, 2017 5:24 pm

Page 1 / 2