Reading RPLS is free for the whole profession. Members post, reply, and get the members-only rooms.
Notifications
Clear all
Software, CAD & Mapping
7
Posts
5
Users
0
Reactions
1,069
Views
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Hello,?ÿ I am new here and this is my first post so any help would definitely be appreciated!
I have a property I need to get the total acreage using the metes and bounds on the deed.
I have summarized them below so maybe someone could give me a quick answer.?ÿ Thanks!
S 66 25 W 1100ft
S 06 52 W 326.40ft
S 79 20 W 115.10ft
N 39 37 W 1031.40ft
N 57 03 E 236.20ft
S 61 41 40 E 726.21ft
S 88 04 E 1086.10ft
S 06 52 W 128.80ft
Posted : January 12, 2018 7:57 pm
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Can you recheck your numbers? I missed the closure by 382'.
Posted : January 13, 2018 9:31 am
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
me too, and I don't quickly see a simple fix, would be nice to see what the figure actually looks like, you know there are problems when the figure crosses itself.
Posted : January 13, 2018 11:36 am
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Actually use using S86-25W?ÿ for the first course works.
12.96 ac doing that, but you would need some confirmation that that is the problem
Posted : January 13, 2018 11:42 am
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Try the first course as S 86 25 W
?ÿ
Edit: shucks.?ÿ Moe beat me by seconds.
Posted : January 13, 2018 11:42 am
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
I'm pretty sure that's it, but it does make an odd shaped parcel.
Posted : January 13, 2018 12:11 pm
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
I've spent a lot of time over the years among older deeds in the mid-Atlantic, and in that context this parcel is slightly unusual, bordering (pun intended) on the ordinary. A few gaps and gores, and a clever scavenger, and there they are.
?ÿ
Cheers,
Henry
Posted : January 13, 2018 6:53 pm