AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Carlson 3 surfaces volume

5 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
912 Views
James Johnston
(@james-johnston)
Posts: 624
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Hello,

I have three surfaces: eg, design, as-built. When calculating neatline volumes, I am not 100% sure in which order I have to select the surfaces. Anyone who have used this 3 surfaces volume call willing to shine some light on this procedure? Contractor is paid to neatline only.


 
Posted : August 13, 2014 6:45 am
ladd-nelson
(@ladd-nelson)
Posts: 738
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'm not entirely sure if the Three Triangulation Surface Volumes routine will get you what you need.

If I understand your need correctly, would the Two Triangulation Surface Volumes routine between Existing Ground and the As-Built surface but with an Inclusion/perimeter boundary of your neat-line get you the needed volume?


 
Posted : August 13, 2014 4:34 pm
James Johnston
(@james-johnston)
Posts: 624
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The neatline is a actually a 3D surface, the standard two surfaces with inclusive boundary does not do the trick on this one.

To make things a bit more complicated, the situation is not a cut (like on the example in the help menu with a rock strata) but a fill. So I am not too sure if the routine is designed for this scenario.


 
Posted : August 13, 2014 10:04 pm
imaudigger
(@imaudigger)
Posts: 2957
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The best way to figure it out is to create 3 simple surfaces from 3D lines that represent your situation and test the routine. Some times falling back to the tried and true method of average end areas is the best.


 
Posted : August 14, 2014 8:18 am
James Johnston
(@james-johnston)
Posts: 624
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I agree with you - AEA is pretty solid when it comes to QC on volume calcs.


 
Posted : August 14, 2014 12:16 pm