Trimble Business Center — Stop stitching software together. Start free trial.

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

GIS files

5 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
471 Views
SIR VEYSALOT
(@sir-veysalot)
Posts: 657
Free
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

We've been asked to provide .shp, .dbf, .shx, .dbf, .prj, .sbh, .sbx, and .xml files for a pipeline project we completed. We are using Carlson 2012/AutoCAD Map 2012. We have no problem furnishing the .shp, .shx, and .dbf files using Carlson GIS shapefile export. Is it possible to furnish the remaining files or must one process this information through ARCGIS or related GIS program?

Thanks


 
Posted : May 19, 2014 9:04 am
hardline228
(@hardline228)
Posts: 177
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

mapexport command will generate the dbf, idx, prj, shp, and shx. The others though, don't know how you get those, they're certainly not required to make use


 
Posted : May 19, 2014 10:04 am
imaudigger
(@imaudigger)
Posts: 2957
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The xml file is the metadata, perhaps the most important information to attach to GIS data.

ArcMap AutoCAD Map will create this file for you, but it needs to be populated with job specific information.

Search the help files for the term "metadata". There is an option to export to .xml


 
Posted : May 19, 2014 10:08 am
hardline228
(@hardline228)
Posts: 177
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

It may be important, but then so is the .prj, but it is not required. Shp, shx, dbf.. anything else may be important, but they are still optional.


 
Posted : May 19, 2014 10:23 am
imaudigger
(@imaudigger)
Posts: 2957
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I meant to direct that comment to the original question, not to be argumentative.

I do agree with what you are saying..in order to display the shape file on the screen, there are only a handful of files required. The .proj and .xml files significantly enhance the data.

We always make an effort to make it abundantly clear what units, coordinate system, basis of elevation, accuracy, intended purpose, etc. applies to the data being distributed. Traditionally this was done via. a transmittal letter to the end user.

With GIS data there may be significantly more end users. It is very convenient that we can generate this information as a package of files that is included every time the data is disseminated.

Generating metadata can be time consuming. Everyone must make the decision if they feel that it is in their best interest to take the time to do this without being compensated.


 
Posted : May 19, 2014 3:00 pm