AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

NGVD29 TO NAVD88

9 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
795 Views
surveyor85
(@surveyor85)
Posts: 84
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Rookie question...

When looking at NGS monument datasheets there is 'X' amount of difference between the two vertical datums near a project. Is it a bad idea to apply that X amount to elevations on the project to get from one datum to another?? A client need the elevations in 29 and the project is in 88.


 
Posted : April 30, 2015 1:23 pm
PLS30820
(@pls30820)
Posts: 317
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

USE CORPSCON TO GET THE DIFFERENCE IN ELEVATIONS.


 
Posted : April 30, 2015 1:33 pm
Dan Patterson
(@dan-patterson)
Posts: 1272
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> USE CORPSCON TO GET THE DIFFERENCE IN ELEVATIONS.

I agree on using corpscon. That being said, it will most likely be an identical conversion depending on how 'close' the BM is.


 
Posted : April 30, 2015 1:51 pm
geeoddmike
(@geeoddmike)
Posts: 1556
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

For some details about VERTCON see: http://geodesyattamucc.pbworks.com/f/VERTCON4ProfSurveyor.pdf

This is a preprint graphics not included in the archive version linked from the NGS site.

HTH,

DMM


 
Posted : April 30, 2015 1:57 pm
Thadd
(@thadd)
Posts: 78
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

CORPSCON uses VERTCON

VERTCON documentation stated that it is not appropriate for 1st, 2nd or 3rd order.

Most states require 3rd order: 0.05' per sq. rt. mile.

Therefore VERTCON may not provide the answer you seek.

In my Town, VERTCON returns a difference of 0.9'. Comparing the record monuments results in 1.1' to 1.2'. Using long GPS observations puts one closer to 1.4'. (Multiple 24-hour sets)

I would check it. Grab the coordinates, check the differences. Find some monuments with published elevations on both datums and see how close things line up.

Also look at the CORS stations for the velocities. Now look at the dates when the NGVD and NAVD elevations were established and see how close the difference to VERTCON matches the upward velocity.


 
Posted : April 30, 2015 8:35 pm

Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 8310
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> When looking at NGS monument datasheets there is 'X' amount of difference between the two vertical datums near a project. Is it a bad idea to apply that X amount to elevations on the project to get from one datum to another?? A client need the elevations in 29 and the project is in 88.
I think that is okay for typical development project work. I think I'd try to get a few datasheets that bracketed the project area and use an average. And make sure the elevations are products of high quality levelling. And then check with Corpscon (it's free, what the hey).

If this is control work purporting to establish NGVD29 elevations relative to the national datum to some high degree of precision - not so much.


 
Posted : April 30, 2015 8:52 pm
Joe the Surveyor
(@joe-the-surveyor)
Posts: 1932
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

For most of our work around here we subtract 1.08 feet. Which for most purposes works well.


 
Posted : May 1, 2015 4:46 am
Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 8310
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> For most of our work around here we subtract 1.08 feet. Which for most purposes works well.
The difference in Portland area is about 3.3 feet. It varies from place to place.


 
Posted : May 1, 2015 5:39 am
surveyor85
(@surveyor85)
Posts: 84
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Thanks for all the input!


 
Posted : May 1, 2015 6:53 am