Notifications
Clear all

In need of advice

13 Posts
13 Users
0 Reactions
34 Views
(@craig-chase)
Posts: 20
Member
Topic starter
 

This has probably been discussed before. We did surveying work for "Client A" 5 years ago. Client A went bankrupt (after we had been paid fortunately). The bank has sold the foreclosed lots to potential client B. Are we free to use the information that we obtained and were compensated for by client A to the benefit of client B? The information in question consists of 8 acres+/- of topo, control tied into boundary, septic system designs, etc.

 
Posted : March 21, 2012 12:00 pm
(@foggyidea)
Posts: 3467
Member
 

I'm of the opinion that the work belongs to the surveyor, not the client. Check your original agreement with client A and see if ownership was retained by the survey firm...

 
Posted : March 21, 2012 12:03 pm
 jud
(@jud)
Posts: 1920
Member
 

Make a few field checks, recover your control and then if all checks, use the data you collected before. Be up front with this new client about what you did and bill accordingly.
jud

 
Posted : March 21, 2012 12:27 pm
(@chan-geplease)
Posts: 1166
Member
 

I agree with Don. On the other hand, doing a survey on something you already surveyed for somebody else is like a dream come true. Heck ya, use YOUR data.

You're in business to make money, and that's one easy way. You can cut them some slack, but don't go crazy.

Don't be afraid to ask yourself "what is it worth to them?"

 
Posted : March 21, 2012 12:28 pm
(@andy-bruner)
Posts: 2757
Member
 

I agree with Don on this. Unless specifically stated otherwise in the contract all data I collected is mine, copies of the map or plat may be given to the client but the data is mine.

Andy

 
Posted : March 21, 2012 12:28 pm

(@derek-g-graham-ols-olip)
Posts: 2060
Member
 

"Update" is the word to consider so the client has the latest information.

Anything else is "old news".

IMVHO

Cheers

Derek

 
Posted : March 21, 2012 12:40 pm
(@spledeus)
Posts: 2772
Member
 

Reduce, Reuse, Recycle

Reduce your workload while charging the same amount
Reuse your old work, of course field check and verify
Recycle this information into new profit

You can explain the value of the product and offer a slight discount.

 
Posted : March 21, 2012 12:47 pm
(@joe-the-surveyor)
Posts: 1948
Member
 

BINGO!!!

I agree with Don..100%..All our contracts say we own all data, maps, files, etc.

 
Posted : March 21, 2012 1:41 pm
(@tommy-young)
Posts: 2402
Member
 

Tell Client B you had a big ! office fire and have no records of their project.

 
Posted : March 21, 2012 3:00 pm
(@larry-p)
Posts: 1124
Member
 

> This has probably been discussed before. We did surveying work for "Client A" 5 years ago. Client A went bankrupt (after we had been paid fortunately). The bank has sold the foreclosed lots to potential client B. Are we free to use the information that we obtained and were compensated for by client A to the benefit of client B? The information in question consists of 8 acres+/- of topo, control tied into boundary, septic system designs, etc.

When faced with this sort of question it is always good to refer to the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Most state codes contain wording that is similar to those found in the NCEES Model Code of Ethics.

Licensees shall not accept compensation, financial or otherwise, from more than one party for services pertaining to the same project, unless the circumstances are fully disclosed and agreed to by all interested parties.

I looked at the VT Code and to my surprise did not find words to that affect.

The code I posted would seem to bar you reusing the data without first getting the approval from Client A and Client B. However, that interpretation seems to revolve around the words "same project". The situation you describe clearly seems to be two totally different projects. Were I in your position I would think very carefully about verifying the key data points and using your existing knowledge to the advantage of both you and Client B. (The advantage to Client B being that you can produce the desired results quicker than if you did not have the prior knowledge.)

Having said that, if you publish an hourly rate schedule I do not believe you can ethically charge for the time you previously spent gathering the data. If on the other hand you price each job individually, then the client is paying for your knowledge and not your time. In that case, rock and roll baby. Knowledge has value and you should be paid for that value.

Hope that gives you some things to consider.

Larry P

 
Posted : March 21, 2012 4:50 pm

 JB
(@jb)
Posts: 794
Member
 

When in doubt, 3 steps...
1)Disclose
2)Disclose
3)Disclose

 
Posted : March 21, 2012 4:55 pm
(@bill93)
Posts: 9837
Member
 

>all interested parties

One might argue that Client A is no longer an interested party since they don't own the land?

 
Posted : March 21, 2012 4:59 pm
(@tangent)
Posts: 50
Member
 

If client B gets the impression you are gauging for the same work, he may choose to look elsewhere on his next project and perhaps this one. If he is a one-race pony or one who frequents other surveyors, then sell him the product at 75% value, knowing he is coming through your door for one purpose: to maximize his margins.

Might they be a prospective and long-term client? He may be worth a more reasonable turn-over fee. When this happens, we have a policy to provide review of any old work which may include a site visit to verify there are no major changes, control and spot checks, updated borders and dates, and review for compliance with current codes and standards. This all takes time but I don't think I would charge anything close to 50% of the original product (depending on size of the project) yet I am no fan of giving it away.

 
Posted : March 21, 2012 6:29 pm