Notifications
Clear all
Business, Finance & Legal
3
Posts
3
Users
0
Reactions
319
Views
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
...............accretion of the land along the Arkansas River
http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20ARCO%2020110907009.xml&docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR
A few principles on water boundaries etc.
Cheers
Derek
Posted : September 8, 2011 2:21 pm
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Derek,
I've been following this one from the beginning. It is similar to Banks v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. You can't claim what doesn't exist.
Banks v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.
DDSM
:beer:
Posted : September 8, 2011 3:53 pm
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Dan and Derek,
Both cases are worth reading and saving. Anderson Tully has been involved in many riparian cases. I like the Banks v Chicago Mill case you referenced for the discussion of the processes of accretion and avulsion. Brings back memories of the Laughlin classes and discussions with Jim Simpson.
Best to you both.
Jerry
Posted : September 8, 2011 8:38 pm