I think it goes something like this:
?ÿ-The answer to my math problem is 218. Can you guys help me prove that it's correct?
?ÿ
More like x=218.
what is the x? The mathematician won??t tell me what the x is
Nah, the answer is always 42
@r-leonard ????ÿ
Love it.?ÿ If anybody has a slow April they should keep feeding the troll.?ÿ Hilarious.
Ok I'll do it. Lets push the structures over the property line because of some fence remains. That's what most surveyors will conclude. Yes I'm being sarcastic.
This is so typical of most every survey, there is nothing to complain about or change the boundary for. Let it go. The fence remains are only shown as a reference, they aren't remotely straight or "on-line".?ÿ
dark line far right is record line, and verified by two filed surveys.?ÿ rebar monuments (black squares) and remnants (and speculated old fence) are far from the record line.
After three different threads on this enigma wrapped riddle, I still don??t know the question much less the answer, but I will suggest that there appears to be some seriously spiraling circular logic involved in deriving a preconceived conclusion based on what, I have no idea.
The op says he from Wisconsin, and has been re-asking in various ways about what appears to be the same situation.
The profile says licensed in WI but that seems to be incorrect.
He is licensed, but not as a surveyor, from what I remember from another thread.
Ok I'll do it. Lets push the structures over the property line because of some fence remains. That's what most surveyors will conclude. Yes I'm being sarcastic.
This is so typical of most every survey, there is nothing to complain about or change the boundary for. Let it go. The fence remains are only shown as a reference, they aren't remotely straight or "on-line".?ÿ
A fence is not occupation all by it self.
Seek out the most respected surveyor in your area that isn't employed by your engineering firm or even remotely associated with said engineering firm, and hire him/her as a consultant for your concerns.?ÿ?ÿ
What's the deal with Wisconsin?
The Curse of Richard Schaut.?ÿ ?ÿ?ÿ
@james-fleming?ÿ exactly!?ÿ ?ÿwe need to know where the power poles are in order to solve this mystery!
@williwaw?ÿ ?ÿThe thing that I keep thinking is that if he had been up front with some real information, it might have been an interesting discussion.?ÿ I've seen many on this board (and I have too) do research in their free time to look into problems just like this.?ÿ ?ÿBut I feel the good will was lost in the vagueness of the response to questions.?ÿ?ÿ
From my personal experience and from reading this board, when trying to explain surveying issues to an engineer who has an interest in not understanding, it's better if the person doing the explaining is not a surveyor.
@larry-best?ÿ ?ÿRemember the structural engineer that got busted for surveying without a license years ago??ÿ maybe california??ÿ He had a funny note on his maps about how structural engineers were better than all other professionals.?ÿ ?ÿtoo funny.?ÿ?ÿ
