there have been three total "surveys" now...
first in early 2000s, second couple years ago, and third just recently finished.
the second i JUST found out was never completed, or filed.?ÿ which is why I'm asking the question on that topic
the third had the remnants
@lurker first and third were filed/recorded
@andy-j from a legal standpoint, i'm not sure how favorable it would be seen posting details versus hypotheticals.
?ÿ
well, I don't know why you've been hounding this board trying to find someone to support your ideas, then.?ÿ ?ÿWithout details, I think you can see that most of us want nothing to do with your guessing game.?ÿ ?ÿBest of luck to you.?ÿ ?ÿ
Imagine a student comes to you with a question:
What's the answer to my math problem?
?ÿ ?ÿ ?ÿ ?ÿ Is it an addition, multiplication, or something harder, like calculus?
It may involve subtraction and division.
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ We can probably help with that problem,?ÿ What is it?
It uses?ÿ 37, 25, and 5.
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ What are the operations?
Division and addition.
?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ I thought you said subtraction.?ÿ But the answer depends on the order of the numbers and the operations.
..... etc.?ÿ -------------------------------------------------------
You can't work the (math or surveying) problem unless you have all the data about the problem.
In surveying problems there are competing principles that may contradict each other unless you know from the facts (including history) which principle to apply.
If they were filed/recorded
first and third were filed/recorded
Then it is part of the public record, available to everyone. You wouldn't be posting anything that wasn't already available...
I think it goes something like this:
?ÿ-The answer to my math problem is 218. Can you guys help me prove that it's correct?
?ÿ
@dougie that is true.
I think it goes something like this:
?ÿ-The answer to my math problem is 218. Can you guys help me prove that it's correct?
?ÿ
More like x=218.
what is the x? The mathematician won??t tell me what the x is
Nah, the answer is always 42
@r-leonard ????ÿ
Love it.?ÿ If anybody has a slow April they should keep feeding the troll.?ÿ Hilarious.
Ok I'll do it. Lets push the structures over the property line because of some fence remains. That's what most surveyors will conclude. Yes I'm being sarcastic.
This is so typical of most every survey, there is nothing to complain about or change the boundary for. Let it go. The fence remains are only shown as a reference, they aren't remotely straight or "on-line".?ÿ
dark line far right is record line, and verified by two filed surveys.?ÿ rebar monuments (black squares) and remnants (and speculated old fence) are far from the record line.
After three different threads on this enigma wrapped riddle, I still don??t know the question much less the answer, but I will suggest that there appears to be some seriously spiraling circular logic involved in deriving a preconceived conclusion based on what, I have no idea.
Just because I'm paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get me.
The op says he from Wisconsin, and has been re-asking in various ways about what appears to be the same situation.
The profile says licensed in WI but that seems to be incorrect.
He is licensed, but not as a surveyor, from what I remember from another thread.
Ok I'll do it. Lets push the structures over the property line because of some fence remains. That's what most surveyors will conclude. Yes I'm being sarcastic.
This is so typical of most every survey, there is nothing to complain about or change the boundary for. Let it go. The fence remains are only shown as a reference, they aren't remotely straight or "on-line".?ÿ
A fence is not occupation all by it self.
Seek out the most respected surveyor in your area that isn't employed by your engineering firm or even remotely associated with said engineering firm, and hire him/her as a consultant for your concerns.?ÿ?ÿ