Kent McMillan, post: 439414, member: 3 wrote: So, basically you're posting as an innocent bystander who witnessed the whole thing? I understand and I ...

Kent McMillan, post: 439411, member: 3 wrote: So, what you're saying is that when you did this using Trimble equipment, the DC queried you for the lon...

Kent,I think we are talking about different things here. After re-reading some of you posts above, you may be asking a different question than I was t...

Kent McMillan, post: 439405, member: 3 wrote: Is it, by chance, the meridian midway between the base and the rover position where the projection is fi...

Mark Silver, post: 439402, member: 1087 wrote: Loyal: On the yellow side, I would expect the LDP to be setup with the CM and LofO to be the first poin...

rfc, post: 439390, member: 8882 wrote: I'm confused. Weren't the stars around, and their azimuth's measurable to within a few seconds or so, many year...

Kent McMillan, post: 439387, member: 3 wrote: I don't know enough about the projections that the Trimble salespeople convinced their customers to use,...

Tom Adams, post: 439357, member: 7285 wrote: Sounds like Texas needs to build a wall..... To keep the Texans IN???:cool:

Well that has to beat the crap out of the jackleg, dipsh*t, dufus & goofus, "magnetic" bearings, which (based on your earlier posts) are +/- sever...

Monte, post: 439136, member: 11913 wrote: My story is old, so it may not have much relevance, but a few years back, the yellow company had their speci...

SECO is owned by Trimble (since 2008 I think).Leica is part of HEXAGON (Sweden).Loyal

Anyone remember...EBCDIC?

If you have an approximate Lat/Lon, then "radial search" might be your best bet.Loyal

Got to "Survey Mark Datasheets" and you will get a bunch of different options.I just tried USGS Quad Name, and it worked fine.Loyal

I just tried it again, and got the same error as you. I guess I busted it earlier!:oops:

I've been using it all day, and it appears to be working fine (Nevada).Loyal

NICE!

Been there, done that (1968-1970)! But it was a K Serial No., 65 HP-289 Fastback, and it was at a somewhat higher RPM 😉

Richard Imrie, post: 438749, member: 11256 wrote: Blasphemy!If there isn't a law against that, there should be...:scream:

Something like that (at least in practice)!;)