AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
loyal
loyal
@loyal
Free
Joined: July 2, 2010 11:11 pm
Last seen: June 28, 2026 8:47 pm
Topics: 212 / Replies: 3523
Reply
RE: Original PLSS Corners

As ALWAYS...it depends. Rotted Wood Posts (or the remains thereof), ALWAYS get a new Pipe/Cap.Well marked/set Posts, may or may not get re-monumented,...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: How good can really long occupation time observations get?

spledeus, post: 362535, member: 3579 wrote: I was told by Dave Doyle in 2011 that a CORS needs about 2.5 years of observations to obtain an accurate v...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Convert UTM to SPC?

Lee D, post: 362503, member: 7971 wrote: The UTM points have to have some kind of elevation on them before thy can be converted to LLh in TBC. I just ...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Plotting 500 ac. Tract with 340 Sides

Man...that's a LOT of pebble piles to look for! o.O

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Federal Land Bank records

You may have some luck here: Although it is probably just a start... Loyal

11 years ago
Reply
RE: NGS DATASHEETS not working

Beats me guys, HTDP & Data Explorer currently working for me (WIN7/IE) Loyal

11 years ago
Reply
RE: OPUS expanded report

Dan Patterson, post: 360099, member: 1179 wrote: I guess, but how the heck am I supposed to know its NAVD 2022 from that? We typically have a foot bet...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Latitudes again!

Larry Scott, post: 359912, member: 8766 wrote: There you have it. Free range, no fences. Parcel sold. New owner calls for survey to build a fence. Nei...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: OPUS expanded report

Here's one of mine from a couple of months back (on a Bench Mark) ORTHO HGT: 1298.664 (m) [NAVD88 (Computed using GEOID12B)]APPROX ORTHO HGT: 1...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Where am I?

Dave Karoly, post: 359951, member: 94 wrote: Sorry the photo is slightly blurry, my phone is like that. One picture is fantastic and the next is slig...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Latitudes again!

Larry Scott, post: 359902, member: 8766 wrote: So, if the POB of an existing parcel was the mid point of the Nevada Utah border? Would that be by lati...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Latitudes again!

Larry Scott, post: 359896, member: 8766 wrote: :gammon: I meant Utah Nevada border. Which one? 1861?1862?1866? Theoretical ("deed")?As surveyed and...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Latitudes again!

Larry Scott, post: 359894, member: 8766 wrote: And what if the question was to monument the mid point of the California Utah border? That's real world...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference frames and projections

Actually, the State Plane Zones have remained essentially the same (geometrically) since the 1930s (with a few exceptions like Montana). The UTM Zones...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: The Mythology of Ground Coordinates

MightyMoe, post: 357832, member: 700 wrote: NAVD88 is going to be around for a long time. I hear ya Mighty! I still work on projects that are expres...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: The Mythology of Ground Coordinates

A Harris, post: 357809, member: 81 wrote: When I began using Surveying Grade GPS the process of scale factor and ground to grid and such became imprac...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: The Mythology of Ground Coordinates

gschrock, post: 357802, member: 556 wrote: We get about 4.3' Hz and 1/3' V up here. Dru Smith had a slide (generalized) of the expected shifts from NA...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: The Mythology of Ground Coordinates

A Harris, post: 357740, member: 81 wrote: The locations I've been recording over the county as WGS84 using TxDot downloads and GNSS Solutions have bee...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Food for thought...

Nice one Paden! Isn't Oklahoma where the GLO Patented "diagonal" å?s of å?s? Or was it the SWå? of the SWå? kinda things? You guys do a lot of things ...

11 years ago
Page 104 / 187