Prayers sent!
@alowell Yes. Based on that note, my best guess is that he used that line and accepted the bearing from the 1968 plat. If magnetic north was directly...
@alowell The note you posted is incomplete. I'd bet that the surveyor tied to a line from a previous survey and no magnetic bearing was directly obs...
@stacy-carroll He is but is not well.
That surveyor was a dual registrant and practiced until the late 90's (or thereabouts). He was the only one at that time that regularly ran Astronomic...
@jim-frame?ÿ I interviewed a guy recently and that is what his current company is using using for data collection. I didn't hire the guy but I sold ...
Bought a couple of small boxes of fried crickets as a joke not too long ago. The kids and I both agreed that one was enough. I had the salt and vinega...
@leegreen sent you a message
@michigan-left 772.26 vs 772.38. I hear you on mixing things but I did this to get various checks
@olemanriver Opus differs from the nRTK by only +.045'. Base on site BM to County monument is -.12'. If Opus elevation is used, I'm closer to .07' di...
@oldpacer Thank you
@oldpacer No post processing software. If we have needed SPC in the past we have used OPUS for post processing. ?ÿ
@oldpacer Would setting the base on the county monument and the rover on the site BM accomplish this or would the data need to be post processed?
@michigan-left The county monument has a county published elevation. My initial nRTK elevation differs .15 when shot with base/rover from a new point ...
@mightymoe Thanks. I??ll reach out to the county engineer who is the administrator for our county. There were no FEMA linked flood studies for this ...
@chris-mills?ÿ This was found in a CLCL. I thought it was interesting since I had never seen a penny used. It will probably just be paved over in a f...
@mightymoe First time for me too