Ok, with all the nostalgia, let's see if anyone recognizes this. There once was a time I had it memorized. 37744:16701 2612702 352 52111057111003...

Ken Salzmann, post: 360477, member: 398 wrote: One more tip: get the legs leveled and centered over the point with your tribrach, and THEN add the ins...

For MS Word, you see more codes by using Alt-F9, although it doesn't show as much as the old WordPerfect. Note that Word stores the codes with the pa...

If you are someone with influence over Corpscon, are you aware of the problem in version 6 with elevation factor and combined factor, such that they a...

The OP is not in the US.

I'm not up on the rules, but there has been a lot of talk about narrowbanding that I thought dictated a maximum width of 12.5 kHz for this service in ...

rfc, post: 359988, member: 8882 wrote: SP coordinates, but they're just the same US Survey feet If I did it right, I found the combined factor for y...

I'd make a copy of your data file, free up the bearing on the 100 ft line, hold the coordinates of the furthest apart points from the old survey, and ...

astrodanco, post: 358950, member: 7558 wrote: That makes a good Faraday cage Shhh. Don't educate the thieves.

Jim in AZ, post: 359408, member: 249 wrote: Took me 42 years, but last summer found two circa 1919 GLO caps on a north-south line that we measured 528...

I couldn't get FixWeek to install on my XP either - it just keeps saying it needs to update and apparently never succeeds. Maybe the path name may be...

Since the difference between International Foot and US Survey Foot is exactly 2 ppm, it is moot for most practical work except when using large grid c...