Today I reviewed a significant survey which involved breaking down a full section to create four tracts out of the northeast quarter thereof while going around two other pre-existing tracts. The survey was dated May 2. The drawing was excellent. However, in the description written for the first parecel, one line had a typo that changed the bearing by four minutes. Three of the four parcels included that same boundary and this was the only inconsistent number. Then, the area listed in the description for the fourth parcel was off by about 48 acres. The listed area would have been the total for the combination of the third and fourth parcels, not the fourth parcel by itself. A simple error.
I called the signing surveyor. Congratulated him on preparing a very nice plat and discussed the difficulties encountered with that particular section. Then I told him of the two problems. We discussed how simple it was to do this. However, one deed had already been filed, so a corrective deed will be needed. Fortunately, the other parcel has not yet been deeded away, so it will be simple to fix this. Still, it is embarrassing to admit to others involved in the transactions that mistakes sometimes happen no matter how carefully you try to avoid them.
Then we chatted about our recent experiences and current backlog of projects.
Sounds like a good way of reviewing.:good:
Dear Mr. Cow
In reviewing your opening post, I found it to be generally clear and well worded. However, at the approximate middle of the third line, the word "parecel" is used where the correct word to be used is "parcel".
Please make this correction and resubmit your opening post for filing.
All the best,
Post reviewer
Dear Mr. Cow
Listen here, you pencil-necked, eater of dog excrement. Your BVD's must be scrunched into a very tiny little wad. But, that is probably because they first had to be moved out of the way so you could insert your cranium into your rectum. Your attitude is deplorable. There are 3204 characters on the plat and you want to reject it because there should only be 3203. You may place your labia on my gluteus maximus and create a negative pressure within your oral cavity. Furthermore, if you would only acquire a Buxley's Dictionary of the English Language, you would discover that the original form of 'parcel' was 'parecel' and either may be used. For your information, I have already had verbal relations with your three immediate supervisors. They all agreed that you are a moron. May you enjoy your upcoming appointment at the Office for Unemployed Twits.
😉 😉 😉 😉 😉 😉 😉 😉
Dear Mr. Cow
did you mean "parasol"? Or maybe "partial".
Dear Mr. Cow
@&%#@$**&$ anal retentive cretins. Why, Lord, do you make all of them into survey reviewers?:'(
Dear Mr. Cow
> @&%#@$**&$ anal retentive cretins. Why, Lord, do you make all of them into survey reviewers?:'(
Mr. Cow
"@&%#@$**&$ anal retentive cretins" is a sentence fragment. Please change to:
@&%#@$**&$ anal retentive cretins; why, Lord, do you make all of them into survey reviewers?
and resubmit. Your attention to this matter in a timely fashion would be greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
A.R. Cretin
Senior Reviewer
Dear Mr. Cow
Dear divine bovine Holiness,
As suggested before it would behoove your Holiness to alternate grazing areas. Your current grazing area is vegetation grown for specifically medicinal purposes. I understand that this area is of particular interest to you in as much as the vegetation “makes you feel good”. However, if Your Holiness insists on consuming this vegetation, please refrain from making public statements which may blemish your reputation.:-D
Have a great FRIDAY!B-)
Dear Mr. Cow
MOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dammit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Somebody's been p!ssing in my favorite pond.
Do you need a sign?
By Mr. Reverend Cow, AKA Holy Bull!
🙂
N
Dear Mr. Cow
I think it's your neighbors, they do have riparian rights, don't they?
😉
Dear Mr. Cow
yea, when pigs fly...
Dear Mr. Cow
This is a fun post.
