SPMPLS, post: 435277, member: 11785 wrote: I love this forum. I don't need cable TV when I have the KMBC to read.
I read Kent's part with a smooth, condescending, Texas drawl; it makes it that much better...
RADAR, post: 435360, member: 413 wrote: I read Kent's part with a smooth, condescending, Texas drawl; it makes it that much better...
I had cabbage for supper before I read Kent's diatribe. It's much easier to read while periodically leaning over a bit in the chair and breaking wind...
RADAR, post: 435360, member: 413 wrote: I read Kent's part with a smooth, condescending, Texas drawl; it makes it that much better...
I've always heard it in my mind as sounding somewhat like Foghorn Leghorn:
??As senior rooster ??round here, it??s my duty, and my pleasure, to instruct junior roosters in the ancient art of roostery?
You guys crack me up! I just wish I had the time to read it all :p
Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Typing class 9th grade!
Scott Ellis, post: 435306, member: 7154 wrote: How did you do on the sample problems?
If I remember correctly, I got the first one entirely correct. I did get one wrong on the second one, The part about who owned the fee under the road, if I remember correctly. The final one never got completed, it is still laying around on my to get to pile to finish up once the ground freezes up.
Gene Kooper, post: 435356, member: 9850 wrote: And it is so easy!
That was a rise? Merely stating the obvious is hardly a rise.
The whole red herring of mining claims making the PLSS somehow equivalent to states within which every acre is part of an original grant described by metes and bounds and all that entails was disposed of years ago when the actual percentage of acres of PLSSia covered by the same is considered. Beyond that there may well be absolutely no mining claims whatsover in many states of PLSSia, so it obviously wasn't working for them as a demonstration of complexity. The whole "but we have mining claims" assertion was generally inapplicable.
Gene Kooper, post: 435355, member: 9850 wrote: No, Kent. I do mineral survey retracements/resurveys for both mining and private clients. None are "mortgage surveys".
Let the record show, however, that you declined to answer the question whether you actually EVER resurvey played-out placer claims. If in fact you occasionally do, approximately what percentage of your time is spent on that as an activity. Would less than 10% be a fair estimate or is it so inconsequential that it is even less?
[MEDIA=youtube]W5vV_K4533A[/MEDIA]
Word to the wisexxx
😎