Notifications
Clear all

Property Line Width

61 Posts
37 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@bobwesterman)
Posts: 245
Registered
 

Holy Cow, post: 398494, member: 50 wrote: So what happens if it ain't your wife? Does it matter if it's somebody else's wife?

Dave Karoly, post: 398511, member: 94 wrote: That would be adverse possession.

Only if it's "open and notorious".

 
Posted : 04/11/2016 4:08 pm
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25292
 

And for at least the minimum number of years for your State.

 
Posted : 04/11/2016 4:50 pm
(@a-harris)
Posts: 8761
 

Only if it's "open and notorious".

Once notice is made, you could call it "hostile".

 
Posted : 05/11/2016 9:38 am
(@francish)
Posts: 378
Registered
 

The architect is asking a valid question. Usually architects & builders often measure building dimensions - position of a house wall from the partition wall.
If the contractor does not have an inhouse surveyor who will layout the building gridlines then most often he has a foreman that would measure house positions based on what's available - walls, roads, curbs, that appear in the topography plan/construction plans.
So if a wall is 15cm thick and a foreman would base his measurements from the face of the wall, by the time he reaches the other retaining wall, he would be short by 15cm compared with his drawings.
Real world scenarios against those that sit in their office drawing o-width lines in their latest copy of autocad.

 
Posted : 05/11/2016 11:31 pm
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25292
 

Oh, my.

 
Posted : 06/11/2016 5:08 am
(@edward-reading)
Posts: 559
Registered
 

This post explains a lot...

 
Posted : 06/11/2016 7:23 am
(@peter-ehlert)
Posts: 2951
 

FrancisH, post: 398615, member: 10211 wrote: The architect is asking a valid question. Usually architects & builders often measure building dimensions - position of a house wall from the partition wall.
If the contractor does not have an inhouse surveyor who will layout the building gridlines then most often he has a foreman that would measure house positions based on what's available - walls, roads, curbs, that appear in the topography plan/construction plans.
So if a wall is 15cm thick and a foreman would base his measurements from the face of the wall, by the time he reaches the other retaining wall, he would be short by 15cm compared with his drawings.
Real world scenarios against those that sit in their office drawing o-width lines in their latest copy of autocad.

I agree, kinda. In your example, the map/plan/plat is deficient. Obviously every Wall has a width. The lot line runs down the middle or one side or another, but if the drawing shows a single line for both the lot line and the wall without a label to explain... you should expect screwups.
5 or 10 minutes drawing a few details would explain everything... not to say that anybody would read the map carefully 🙂

 
Posted : 06/11/2016 7:39 am
(@sicilian-cowboy)
Posts: 1606
Registered
 

Doesn't the width of the property line depend upon the scale of the drawing?:drool:

Hmmmmm......

 
Posted : 07/11/2016 2:07 pm
(@mccracker)
Posts: 340
Registered
 

We have all staked a property line or two, and when staking what did you use? We typically pound lath down the line, center of the lath being the visible, physical, tangible line. While "lines" may have a width of 0, a "property line" must be able to be physically shown or no one would know where they were in reality. In the grand scheme of things and given the amount of error in a surveying, the width of property line is best described as a width of a lath, and God forbid you hit a rock a couple inches down.

 
Posted : 07/11/2016 3:33 pm
(@roger_ls)
Posts: 445
Registered
 

Brian McEachern, post: 398804, member: 9299 wrote: We have all staked a property line or two, and when staking what did you use? We typically pound lath down the line, center of the lath being the visible, physical, tangible line. While "lines" may have a width of 0, a "property line" must be able to be physically shown or no one would know where they were in reality. In the grand scheme of things and given the amount of error in a surveying, the width of property line is best described as a width of a lath, and God forbid you hit a rock a couple inches down.

We had a survey once where we were setting a pipe where 4 properties came together. The neighbor came over and said that the pipe was encroaching onto his property, to which the party chief responded, yes, but only a quarter of it.

 
Posted : 08/11/2016 12:55 pm
(@acd-surveyor)
Posts: 135
Registered
 

A Harris, post: 397776, member: 81 wrote: "A line has no width"

Tell that to your cad program.

 
Posted : 08/11/2016 2:52 pm
(@a-harris)
Posts: 8761
 

ACD Surveyor, post: 398931, member: 494 wrote: Tell that to your cad program.

In Carlson, all my linewidths are set to "zero"

 
Posted : 08/11/2016 3:47 pm
(@mccracker)
Posts: 340
Registered
 

A battle of widths!

[MEDIA=youtube]i6TQ7ljcsjk[/MEDIA]

 
Posted : 08/11/2016 5:07 pm
(@francish)
Posts: 378
Registered
 

"A line has no width"

Let's see... if something has 0 width.... can you see it?

 
Posted : 09/11/2016 2:45 am
(@lmbrls)
Posts: 1066
Registered
 

How many angels can fit on the head of a pin?

 
Posted : 09/11/2016 3:34 am
Page 4 / 5