AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Property line and construction staking with a robotic

23 Posts
15 Users
0 Reactions
607 Views
jaccen
(@jaccen)
Posts: 458
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 
Posted by: @norman-oklahoma

That works until you have to move one hand to operate the dc. I've used the laths. And I can also steady up pretty well without any external props at all. Still, I go with a bipod. This is what quality control is all about - adopting methods that increase the chances of getting a good product.?ÿ

So...I can do it, but can the guy I hired last month also do it? Everytime? More importantly - will he (or she) do it? Using the bipod is my way of being sure (or, at least, increasing the chance) that good plumb is actually being achieved.?ÿ

?ÿ

?ÿ

I can appreciate that train of thought.


 
Posted : December 10, 2019 11:43 am
jflamm
(@jflamm)
Posts: 366
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

@norman-oklahoma

Exactly.  When we have MEPF's doing their layout from the same baseline as our carpenters that are laying out their interior walls, things stay in harmony.  Can't have floor penetrations and plumbing sticking halfway outside of a wall because Joe Plumber decided to throw around his own control to his liking.  Most of our jobs are BIM coordinated, built virtually and clashed detected before they hit the jobsite.  That also allows for a lot of pre-fab of mechanical and plumbing systems offsite in a controlled environment for good QA/QC.  Saying this, it's imperative we keep error/slop to a minimum.  Consistency is golden.  We can be off, just off together!


 
Posted : December 10, 2019 12:47 pm
jkinak
(@jkinak)
Posts: 378
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I agree with RKinnie: Getting up and down gets old fast and the older you get the faster it gets old.

If your 360 prism has a point on the top (like the leicas) then use the prism pole inverted whenever the line of sight allows that.

By doing this you eliminate all of the relevant rod bubble error and it's a lot faster since you don't have to spend any time leveling up the prism pole - just hold it close to vertical and the tilt error will be in the thousandths of a foot. This accuracy is adequate for most civil construction staking activities.

It's also faster because you aren't moving from standing to kneeling and standing again - you are right there ready to set and check your point.

If you are an in an environment where you'll be able to see close to the ground everywhere - just put a section of range pole or a candy cane on the top of the inverted prism and mount your data collector to it. Light - fast - accurate.


 
Posted : December 10, 2019 2:20 pm
Page 2 / 2