"the King can not be wrong"
"If the R/W is 60 feet, it's 60', no more no less. The (private) property lines are lengthened or shortened to the R/W. Period."
Not if the ROW is created along with lots or parcels in a subdivision, since the plat creates all parcels simultaneously. Any excess or deficiency would be equally shared by all parcels, of which the ROW is but one.
"the King can not be wrong"
So, the King is not always right..........not according to some on here?
Keith
James
Did it cite the Clement case?
King Little Rock
BUSHMIAER v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
http://www.loislaw.com/livepublish8923/doclink.htp?alias=ARCASE&cite=231+Ark.+848
As previously stated, appellants offer no proof that they have record title to the disputed area. Without a showing of actual title of record, or by the monuments referred to on the plats, appellants can only rely upon adverse possession, or laches, neither of which is applicable in this case. As to adverse possession, the pertinent portion of Ark. Stats. Anno. (1947), 19-3831, provides as follows:
"Hereafter no title or right of possession to any alley, street, or public park, or any portion thereof, in any city or incorporated town in this State shall or can be acquired by adverse possession or adverse occupancy thereof, and the right of the public or of any city or incorporated town . . . to open or have opened any alley, street or public part, or parts thereof, shall not be defeated in any action or proceeding by reason or because of adverse possession or adverse occupancy of any such alley, street or public park or any portion thereof where such adverse possession or occupancy commenced or begun after the passage of this act * * *. "
😉
"the King can not be wrong"
You might take a look at pages 295-297: Corpus juris: being a complete and systematic statement of the ..., Volume 9 By William Mack
At least somebody likes it!
> You could spend more time on the "straddling the tripod" if you don't like survey discussions!
Sorry Keith, "straddling the tripod" IS a survey discussion. THIS thread is no longer a surveying discussion, though. Kent is just having a lot of fun with you. "Humor" is what it is.
Don't take it so seriously and have a great day. I think everyone still respects you for what you've acheived in your life.
Don
What the Hell....
...........would being a "liberal" have to do professional disagreements regarding property lines!?!?!?!?
Is everyone who disagrees with you a liberal? (and everyone who agrees a conservative? Tea Partier? Nazi?) What's up with you?
Angelo
You may be right about your last guess.
So....Keith advocates accepting the local surveyor's monument especially if it is within 0.14'. I take it he will, then, accept Carl's monument. (?)
And what about when Kent comes along and bumps an old monument over onto the correct line....will Keith accept that professional decision when he retraces that line, or will he set a new monument 0.05' away from the "bumped" monument?
I am so confused.....;-)
Who here can't see that it is a matter of professional judgement when we come up to this sort of scenario.
