I figure that the picture will start the conversation.
?ÿ
Are they for sale?
@loyal I have a 1947 and 1973 sitting around doing nothing
Hi Loyal,
No but thanks for asking. We had them on display this week during a training seminar in Colorado. As far as I know, it??s complete per reference information shown in manuals, Al White??s book, and personal research. A collection brought forth by myself and a colleague.?ÿ
@loyal?ÿ I have a 1947 and 1973 sitting around doing nothing
?ÿ
Got those (and and half a dozen others).?ÿ
I figure that the picture will start the conversation.
?ÿ
You need a lot more mineral survey manuals than the single 1909 Manual!?ÿ ?????ÿ
Sorry, I wasn't able to make the get together.
Nice collection.?ÿ In addition to the '73 and '09, I have a 1902.?ÿ I had a '47, but it has been AWOL for some years.
What strikes me is how the size of the book exploded between the '30 and '47 editions. I seems to me that it could be 2 books, one one doing new surveys, and one on retracements.?ÿ
I agree that the 1930 manual doesn’t seem to fit the mold. I assume that someone suggested making it with the ability to fit into a back pocket or something.
Huff huff huff finally got to the corner...there's some evidence here...catch my breath...okay whip out the Manual, accept or not?