Well I finally sat down and learned the least squares program in Carlson . I have to say I like it alot . Very simple to use . I can run traverse in a network fashion and run a traverse to preset Static Points at random . Can mix Gps and Total Station The more redundancy the better .I am very inpressed with the results so far. No more worry about closing traverse in the old school way .
> Well I finally sat down and learned the least squares program in Carlson . I have to say I like it alot . Very simple to use . I can run traverse in a network fashion and run a traverse to preset Static Points at random . Can mix Gps and Total Station The more redundancy the better .I am very inpressed with the results so far. No more worry about closing traverse in the old school way .
What version Carlson?
Are you using survenet? We run 2010 and I always use edit process raw data for my traverses. I would like to learn survnet though...
> Are you using survenet? We run 2010 and I always use edit process raw data for my traverses. I would like to learn survnet though...
Carlson has a couple of training movies for Survnet.
We are using 2012 intellicad .
We are using Survnet . You still use the Raw data files in surevnet , You got to learn how to set up the program but once you get the hang of it , it pretty simple .
Starting using survnet 3 years ago, never looked back!
I own a SurvNet license. The nice thing about it is you don't have to give it estimated coordinates or an estimated bearing as long as you have a couple of knowns somewhere in your network or at least one known and one GPS vector.
I mostly use StarNet which is simpler to use with multiple brands of DCs. In some situations, though, you have to give it some sort of estimated known (set to free) to get it started.
