Notifications
Clear all
Strictly Surveying
2
Posts
1
Users
0
Reactions
722
Views
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
I found the 0.0335' measure up bust. This means we don't have to re-visit a monitoring job first thing tomorrow.
I learned something new, which is that if the zenith residuals for both faces in star*net don't roughly balance (i.e., +/- the same amount) you might be looking at a measure up bust.
Posted : July 22, 2012 4:21 pm
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
OK turns out I am completely wrong. The 0.0335' isn't a measure up bust at all, it's from the way the I-man is aiming the face one shot by eye and then letting the robot shoot the face two measurement. He and the robot have a different idea of what the center of the target are. (If the robot is actually aiming rather than flopping the scope and recording wherever it lands.)
Posted : July 23, 2012 8:33 am